Re: [fileupload] please help on reviewing FILEUPLOAD-199

nsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [fileupload] please help on reviewing FILEUPLOAD-199

; http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For addit

Re: svn commit: r1455456 - /commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/servlet/ServletFileUpload.java

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe --

Re: [fileupload] please help on reviewing FILEUPLOAD-199

r...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 06.03.2013 um 14:56 schrieb Simone Tripodi: >> >>> And, just for the s

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

t; > Import-Package: javax.servlet,javax.servlet.http,org.apache.commons.io,o > rg.apache.commons.io.output > Include-Resource: META-INF/LICENSE.txt=LICENSE.txt,META-INF/NOTICE.txt=N > OTICE.txt > Tool: Bnd-1.50.0 > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripod

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

rg >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [fileupload] drop JDK1.3 support, update to 1.5 and bump to 2.0.0

e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@com

Re: [io] Proposal for a ProgressOutputStream

Thanks for the hints. Regards Felix Am 25.09.2012 um 17:50 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Wouldn't it also be interesting to know how much progress was made -- if >> at all possible ? &g

Re: [io] Proposal for a ProgressOutputStream

Hi Wouldn't it also be interesting to know how much progress was made -- if at all possible ? For example: having a prospective number of bytes to write and have the update method called with the number of bytes just written ? Regards Felix Am 25.09.2012 um 03:57 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Hi A

Re: Proposal Commons-JNDI

Hi, As a user of Simple JNDI I am all for having a simple JNDI implementation in ASF. +1 (non-binding) from me. Regards Felix Am 08.08.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Jochen Wiedmann: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a new component Commons JNDI for the sandbox. > > The aim would be to have a very ligh

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

Hi, Am 07.06.2012 um 15:45 schrieb Luc Maisonobe: > Hi, > > Le 06/06/2012 18:27, James Carman a écrit : >> Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), >> so I'm all for it! :) >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >> >>> No obje

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

Hi, Am 07.06.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Jörg Schaible: > As we see from Felix' patch, we can satisfy OSGi still for the latter reason > by declaring proper exports. In contrast to the patch I'd select a version > though that makes it totally clear that it is synthetic e.g. I'd take 1. > or 1.4.

Re: [IO] Upcoming IO 2.4

Hi, Ok, then. The issue with patch is IO-333 [1] Regards Felix [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-333 Am 06.06.2012 um 13:38 schrieb Jochen Wiedmann: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Would you consider a bug/patch and include it in th

Re: [IO] Upcoming IO 2.4

Hi, Am 06.06.2012 um 15:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 06.06.2012 um 13:52 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Felix Meschberger >> wrote: >&g

Re: [IO] Upcoming IO 2.4

Hi, Am 06.06.2012 um 13:52 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am on the Felix and Sling projects where we use commons IO and are >> confronted with a OSGi semantic versioning issue with

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

Hi, Am 06.06.2012 um 14:16 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 06.06.2012 um 14:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> >>> Opening ... >> >> ;-) BTW: Thanks alot ! This is appreciate

Re: [IO] Upcoming IO 2.4

Hi I am on the Felix and Sling projects where we use commons IO and are confronted with a OSGi semantic versioning issue with the Commons IO 2.x bundles. According to [1] Commons IO 2.0 is binary compatible with Commons IO 1.4. So I would assume all 2.x versions are binary compatible with 1.4.