[compress] Missing security reports for 1.21

2021-08-04 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
Hi, I think that the security reports for 1.21 are missing from https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-compress/security-reports.html Maybe they went missing during a recent CMS change? Fabian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u

Re: OSS-Fuzz issues are being reported as vulnerabilities

2021-05-24 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
The JFrog reports seem to reference the following two OSS-Fuzz findings, which have not been classified as security issues: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34437 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=33959 OSS-Fuzz and Jazzer, its Java fuzzer, never mark unca

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-05-18 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
A quick update: OSS-Fuzz has gained coverage support for Java. You can access the latest apache-commons report at https://oss-fuzz.com/coverage-report/job/libfuzzer_asan_apache-commons/latest and check how well the fuzzer is doing. Fabian On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 17:44 Fabian Meumertzheim

Re: [all] OSS-Fuzz Issue Publication

2021-05-09 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
able to free up > as much time as necessary for any OSS stuff right now > > On 2021-05-03, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > > > The behavior you are observing has only become the standard somewhat > > recently [1], which is also why I had decided to point it out before we > > pe

Re: [all] OSS-Fuzz Issue Publication

2021-05-03 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
Hi, The behavior you are observing has only become the standard somewhat recently [1], which is also why I had decided to point it out before we performed the integration [2]. Let me first confirm the facts: It is correct that OSS-Fuzz will automatically open the Monorail bugs to the public rough

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-22 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:27 PM Peter Lee wrote: > I just created a PR in Compress > https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/189 Thanks! > IIUC I could create a PR github.com/google/oss-fuzz to include my google > account in auto_ccs, and I should ask the primary contact, who is Stefen

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-20 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
mail appears to use a dynamic address. > > > > > > > Otherwise, I’ve seen the alerts start already > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:27 Fabian Meumertzheim < > > > meumertzh...@code-intelligence.com> wrote: > > > &g

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-20 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
The first OSS-Fuzz build passed and some bugs have already been created. Everything looks good from my side, but let me know if you have any questions. One more thing: Could you perhaps add the following line to the READMEs of compress and imaging? [![Fuzzing Status]( https://oss-fuzz-build-logs.

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-19 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:56 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Can there be more than one "primary" contact? There is a reason why we > use role based mail aliases and mailing lists, it is pretty likely > people become completely unavailable for a while and I don't want to > block adding people to auto

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-19 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:03 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I hope my approval has been enough as I'm not a "reviewer with write > access". I think it will suffice to prove that I have submitted the PRs on behalf of someone affiliated with Apache Commons. The OSS-Fuzz reviewers will review the PR fo

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-18 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > > > Anyone who is (or wants to be) a moderator on that list and has a Google > > account, please let me know the primary email address so that I can add it > > to the "a

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-18 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Can probably do, what is the duty of a primary contact? My github > username is bodewig. The primary contact may be asked to sign off on PRs to that project in the OSS-Fuzz repo, in particular if someone needs to be added to the "auto_ccs" l

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-18 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
Thanks for creating the list. Anyone who is (or wants to be) a moderator on that list and has a Google account, please let me know the primary email address so that I can add it to the "auto_ccs" list for oss-fuzz.com access. Stefan, would you want to act as the "primary_contact"? That does not r

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-17 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 12:43 AM sebb wrote: > How do you ensure that a specific Google account is authorised to view > a particular project? This is exclusively governed by the project's "project.yaml" [1]. An example of such a file is [2]. [1] https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-17 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 3:58 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand this. AFAIU I could never become a "primary" > or an "auto_cc" as I will not create a Google account. Do we need to > have one? In that case somebody who doesn't share my personal set of > allergic reactions may wa

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-14 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
sted in fuzzing for that as well. I do not have a preference on the > email list question. > > Regards, > Matt J > ________ > From: Fabian Meumertzheim > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 12:13 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [all]

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-14 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
to see fuzzed > (for different reasons; some for handling XML or other languages, > others for concurrency issues, serializability, etc). > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 01:42, Fabian Meumertzheim > wrote: > > > > As I am not familiar with the structure of your mailing lists

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

2021-04-13 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
As I am not familiar with the structure of your mailing lists and also can't give a meaningful estimate of the ratio of normal bugs to security issues we will find, I will only provide the following general points of information on OSS-Fuzz: * By design, fuzzing produces little to no false positiv

Re: [COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

2021-03-11 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
g the list of recipients requires a pull request to the OSS-Fuzz repo, but the folks there are very responsive. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:00 PM Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:16 PM sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > How often will the to

Re: [COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

2021-03-10 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:16 PM sebb wrote: > > > > > > How often will the tool be run? > > > How often does it need to be run? > > > > OSS-Fuzz runs its fuzzers continuously and will automatically pick up > > new project commits. I don't know its precise schedule, but I expect > > every proje

Re: [COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

2021-03-09 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:16 PM sebb wrote: > > How often will the tool be run? > How often does it need to be run? OSS-Fuzz runs its fuzzers continuously and will automatically pick up new project commits. I don't know its precise schedule, but I expect every project to be fuzzed at least a coup

Re: [COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

2021-03-06 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:08 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > OTOH I'm not sure I understand the requirements of OSS-Fuzz. I haven't > read the docs only looked at the image of the process. Seeing a > Sheriffbot tracking deadlines makes the me very uncomfortable. I'm a > volunteer and so are most other

[COMPRESS] OSS-Fuzz integration

2021-03-05 Thread Fabian Meumertzheim
I am one of the maintainers of Jazzer (https://github.com/CodeIntelligenceTesting/jazzer), a new open-source fuzzer for JVM projects based on libFuzzer. I have set up a few Commons projects for local fuzzing with Jazzer, which lead to quite a few bug reports in Compress and other projects (https:/