as a blocker we can do a
> 2.0-alpha but we really need to make this code released IMHO, I really
> want to avoid some tunnel effect.
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rm
+1 for slf4j
On 20 August 2014 14:54, Yogesh Rao wrote:
> Though i am not a member of the dev team :-) I would support a full fledge
> facade implementation which doesn't provide any logging at all and let the
> framework user decide which logging would he would like to bind it to.
> SLF4J doe
