I would prefer all Commons projects using the same style :-) sorry can't
help to making some noise :-)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Chen, Haifeng
wrote:
> Mixed whitespace styles should be definitely avoided in anyway.
> Do we have to change 2 spaces indent to 4 spaces? Uma suggest we keep t
Just curious, how did this pass the staging test during the vote?
Thanks
-D
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I burned the time I had last night trying to figure out what was going on
> before I saw Grygorz' explanation and I have been out of pocket today.
> Will not be abl
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-438
I have the changes at https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/vfs-1.0/vfs-smb
for reference only, it does not get pushed to Maven Central
-D
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Israel,
>
>
> The sandbox is not released as a jar f
should it be 1.0.1? since it is just for bug fixes
Thanks
-D
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I am thinking about releasing 1.1 now that we have a small batch of
> changes.
>
> We can continue to 1.1.1 or 1.2 with the issue currently active in Jira.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Parent-POM-24-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-25-Maven-Shared-Components-Parent-POM-20-M9-td5789803.html
-D
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-10-20 15:31 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Ben
is it a typo for 'stagin' at URL??
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> IIRC, I've seen this before when the group ID does not exist in Nexus. So
> you have to ask infra for help.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
commons developers to maintain the CIFS
> code and leave no dilemma.
>
>
>
>
> On 24/05/2014 16:19, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 23 May 2014 17:59, Dan Tran wrote:
>>
>>> I think we just need to promote vfs-cifs and mark jcifs optional. That
>>> complies with Apa
API breakage would be 2.0. Do we know yet that fixing those issue would
send use to 2.0?
Thanks
-D
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The question is would fixing these two issues break compatibility? We have
> three compatibility levels: binary, source, and behavior.
>
>
As a user cutting my own internal bld +1
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, Gabriel Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is currently a specific plan or list of
> requirements to be fulfilled before the 1.0 of commons-csv is made.
>
> For me personally, as well as (I think) other users of
Please please release it :-)
Thanks
-D
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> I think the references to the text file in the NOTICE file don't belong
> there.
> It's vital that the NOTICE file only contain required attributions.
> I think we can put the references in the LICENSE file
since JCIFS is used as optional dependency, isn't it sufficient? here is
the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-438
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
> > Please promote smb module if jcifs (
Please promote smb module if jcifs (LPGL) as optional dependency, i have
been using its snapshot for a couple of years
-Dan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Yes, a release would be good. It's been too long.
>
> I think it's just a matter (for me and others) to take the tim
I am a active VFS user wishing to have an official VFS 2.1 release :-)
Sorry about the noise.
-Dan
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
> > Dan Tran wrote:
> >
> >> VFS has no release for a
VFS has no release for a couple of years. Would you consider it as proper?
-D
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think Phil came up with the idea to try to focus on the components that
> we are able to maintain and put all other stuff to dormant. Here is the
>
is this vote dead?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, William Speirs wrote:
> OK... I don't need my abacus to count votes and see that this failed.
>
> I'll work on the things folks mentioned and try for another release
> this weekend.
>
> Thanks again for all of the help/feedback!
>
> Bill-
>
>
Hello
The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of VFS Maven Plugin 1.0 Beta 1
This plugin is a wrapper of Apache's Commons Virtual File System ( VFS )
To use this plugin, specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.codehaus.mojo
vfs-maven-plugin
Tests in error:
testLoadClass(org.apache.commons.vfs2.impl.test.VfsClassLoaderTests):
code.ClassToLoad
testSealing(org.apache.commons.vfs2.impl.test.VfsClassLoaderTests):
code.sealed.AnotherClass
Tests run: 1745, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Dan Tran
3:02 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> I dont know if there is any read only public server.
>
> Can you just roll in cifs provider into the trunk for 2.1? I will be
> your first beta customer ( even thou we are already perform intensive
> test in house )
>
> -D
>
> On Mon, Se
2.1 ASAP which is on my to-do list. fixing We could
> then roll out a 2.1.1 or 2.2 with this code in it. But there still would
> need to be some kind of testing. Is there a public server that could be
> used for at least read-only tests?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at
perhaps, we can release smb provider as is at commons-vfs and mark it
as experimental? I see a number of apache project doing that.
-D
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I took a closer look at writing unit test case for vfs-cifs and came
> to a con
Gary Gregory
Date: Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Promote vfs-cift out of sandbox?
To: Commons Developers List
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
> I have from now to Octorber to either:
>
> 1. Implement test requirement to graduate vfs-cifs out of sandb
I have from now to Octorber to either:
1. Implement test requirement to graduate vfs-cifs out of sandbox at
Apache common
2. Release it as a alpha/beta at Codehaus together with vfs-maven-plugin
3. Release to our internal repo.
The prefer one is 1
What is VFS 2.1 schedule?
Thanks
-Dan
re covered by this strategy though.
>
> I do not know if there is a server we can embed in our tests out there.
> This is why I started my message with "Ideally".
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>> I am confuse here, you
wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:05, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1. So that i can plan out our own release, what is the 'potential'
>> time frame we may see another release of VFS?
>
> Any time. Rolling a release takes anywhere from a week or a c
rent version of JCIFS.
>
> Then:
>
> - Fill in holes in tests (if any)
> - Fill in holes in features (if any as your needs dictate)
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a forked a copy of vfs-cift to code
Hi,
I have a forked a copy of vfs-cift to codehaus [1] to test it out. It
works so far for me.
What would it take to promote the current VFS's CIFT out of sandbox to
be released with VFS-2.x?
Thanks
-Dan
[1] https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/vfs/vfs-smb/
---
gt;>>
>>
>> No, VFS is on the Bundle-ClassPath.
>>
>
> And VFS and other jars in is our app server jar.
>
> Gary
>
>
>> Gary
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Gary Gregory >> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
running single test with 2.12 is broken on Windows , and no fix
available either.
Dont have the JIRA number with me thou.
-Dan
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> What? The surefire plugin no longer supports runnin
Thanks for discover this issue. Look likes FileProvider get excluded
from export list?
-D
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The classLoader ivar is initialized differently in 1.0 than in 2.0.
> That's why the CCE shows up. A different class loader is used. I'm not
> sure if
29 matches
Mail list logo
