Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler >>> wrote: >>>> Ok, as a first step, I moved the svn :) >>> I've moved the m2 buil

Re: Saving images in Sanselan

2009-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Ok, as a first step, I moved the svn :) > > I've moved the m2 build to use the commons-parent pom and generated > and uploaded the site, should appear after the next sync here: > &

Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Phil Steitz wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>> Ok, as a first step, I moved the svn :) >>> >>> >> What about the sanselan committers? Are they already commons committers? >> (I know that I'm one...

Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Ok, as a first step, I moved the svn :) > What about the sanselan committers? Are they already commons committers? (I know that I'm one...) Do they get voted in if not? Regards Carsten > Carsten > -- Carsten Ziegeler czi

Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Ok, as a first step, I moved the svn :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-01 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Ok, so for moving the code, what directory name should we use? Carsten Henri Yandell wrote: > Off the top of my head: > > Wiki? JIRA rename/category change? Closing of old mailing list? > Updating Incubator page to indicate graduation? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Cars

Sanselan Graduation

2009-07-01 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [sanselan] Next steps

2009-05-18 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
So where are we now with moving/graduating Sanselan? Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [sanselan] Next steps

2009-04-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
he package name o.a.c.sanselan is fine. Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [sanselan] Next steps

2009-04-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I agree that the package name should be changed to o.a.c.x but I'm not so happy with changing the name. Sanselan is well-known in the java image world, so I would rather keep it. We already have Betwixt and Jelly, so we have two prominent libs not using a functional name. Carsten -- Ca

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

2009-04-24 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
omething, it's already done by Charles usually. We already discussd this and Charles slowed down :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

2009-04-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Phil Steitz wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote >> >>> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from >>> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to >>> work on it (which means mor

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

2009-04-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
can move forward. > I think at least all or nearly most of the current Sanselan committers, e.g. Charles, Philipp and myself will be committed to Sanselan. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe,

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
osted. As long as I'm able to commit and it doesn't take ages to get a release out. At the moment, we have two code bases, one at Cocoon at one at Tika. So it might make sense, to first see if we can merge the two and then find a place? Carsten --

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: >> In the Cocoon project we're about to refactor/move some of our common >> xml stuff into an own sub project at Cocoon. This will be a small >> reusable library. So

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2008-12-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
our common xml stuff into an own sub project at Cocoon. This will be a small reusable library. So maybe we could add the common stuff from Tika there as well. We have a huge xml community already within the Cocoon project. Carsten -- Carst

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
x27;m back from vacation :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton schrieb: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I jus

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Pötz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. great. Carsten, Steven refactored the code so that internals of "parent-aware URLStreamHandlers" are hidden in an i

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Mind if I fix a few things in the maven build? We have some prope

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
create enough interest :) Thanks! Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
ma as well. So, the plan is that we add the stuff to the sandbox, add the proposal there as well and continue from there, right? thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
;t discussed this yet etc.), commons seems to be the right place. So, my question is if there is interest here and what it would take to get this a proper commons project? Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Collections 3.2.1 based on RC1

2008-04-15 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: This vote has passed with three +1 votes from the following: Oliver Heger Sebastian Bazley Niall Pemberton Thanks to all for the feedback/votes. Again, another big thanks to the commons team! Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Release Collections 3.2.1 based on RC1

2008-04-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I tested the resulting jar with my OSGi apps and they work fine. Great! :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
. That would be awesome! Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
nay-sayers, speak now or reopen later. * Specifically for James Carman - how does Dave's patch to your COLLECTIONS-194 look? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Commons Lang 2.4 is not in public maven repo

2008-03-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, it seems that for some strange reason commons lang has not been added to the public m2 repo: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-lang/commons-lang/ Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e

Re: New Release of Collections for OSGi?

2008-03-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > we need in Sling a released jar of commons collections with the meta > info for

New Release of Collections for OSGi?

2008-03-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
is released :) So, I'm just curious if there are any plans for a new collections release? (We all would favour solution b)) Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Forwarding to the Felix list. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Begin Message --- On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so > I think we can gi

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
undle info will be correct. Yes, that's fine - many thanks for applying the patch!! For future versions the only thing you might need to change is the package list (if new packages are added or if you start using other third party libs). Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton schrieb: On Jan 7, 2008 2:56 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :) I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot version of the maven bu

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :) I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot version of the maven bundle plugin. Interested

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
l: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-03 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so >> I think we can give it a test drive :) >> >> Attached is a p

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
not export private packages (implementations). In these cases each project has to explicitly declare the public and the private packages. But we could move the default (exporting everything) to the parent pom and then the only change would be to change the packaging from jar to bundle in each pr

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
plugin. And that's it :) The changes to the other projects should be similar. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: /Users/cziegeler/Developer/workspaces/default/commons-proper/commons-parent/pom.xml === --- /U

Re: [m2] release plugin and pom license (was Re: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1)

2007-12-23 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
heard that on the grapevine [1]. >> >> -Rahul >> >> [1] http://tinyurl.com/2kj2vj >> >> >>> - Jörg >>> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
eing said, thanks to this plugin, making a m2 project OSGi compliant > seems really easy as many of the required meta-datas are allready available > in pom. I think this is a good point in OSGi adoption. > :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Thanks for the very positive response so far! Great! I'll come up with some patches for some of the commons projects; there is a minor problem as the current commons parent pom defines the manifest entries, but I think that we can come up with a solution for this. Carsten -- Carsten Zie

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
o interest in applying them :) So, this thread is about checking interest :) and perhaps some of the commons projects want to do it on their own :) Carsten > > Nico. > > 2007/12/19, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi, >> >> the products of commons are highly

Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
ease keep them cross posted. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Commons as a sponsor for Sanselan?

2007-08-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SanselanProposal [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200707.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For