My vote would be to make master 1.8-SNAPSHOT as I doubt 2.x will see the
light-of-day for a LONG time... it's been 3+ years already. Continue with
what Carl is trying to do, so we at least get _something_ out the door.
Also, I _think_ I had to create 2_0 as the branch name, because svn (at the
tim
Everything is as up-to-date as I can tell... just submitted a few merges:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=31deec7a232bacb1204c86788939afaac101b0ef
Bill-
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 1:12 PM Carl Hall wrote:
> Thanks for merging that in. Since 2.0 RC1 was cut, ther
I have worked on some significant enhancements to commons-dbutils, so I
would like to release 2.0.
*Note: This is backwards incompatible change with the 1.x versions. As such
I've changed the maven
coordinates and package names.
dbutils RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~
In thinking about it more (I haven't started implementing anything yet), I
don't see why we would want to drop support for positional parameters... we
could easily handle both. (Both in the same piece of SQL might get tricky,
but that's easy enough to detect and throw an exception.)
As for how nam
+1
Bill-
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> My own +1
>
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> You changed the pom to require a minimum of Java 1.6, but the
> Continuum build has yet to be updated.
How should I have updated the Continuum build?
Thanks for the help...
Bill-
Does anyone have thoughts on releasing commons-dbutils 1.5? There are
5 changes since 1.4 (issues 84, 77, 73, 67, and 66), and I think
that's probably enough to warrant a new release.
I'm new to this whole process, so I'm unsure as to what to do next.
Thanks...
Bill-
---
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>> As we discussed before, this exception will be thrown if the column
>> type doesn't match the generic type. Because of type erasure I don't
>> know of any way to validate the types.
>
> What determines the column type?
As far as I know, the column
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:47 PM, sebb wrote:
>> - @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
>> + @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // cast exception will immediately be
>> thrown and warn the developer
>
> Sorry to keep going on about this, but that does not fully explain why
> it is safe to ignore the u
These are good questions/points...
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:35 PM, sebb wrote:
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * The Class of beans produced by this handler.
> > + */
> > +private Class type;
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * The RowProcessor implementation to use when converting rows into
>
I think so... +1 vote from me.
Bill-
On Sep 29, 2011 1:54 AM, "Henri Yandell" wrote:
> Are the previous issues now put to bed? ie) Should I roll an RC2?
>
> Hen
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>
Please apply DBUTILS-78_Future_v3.diff which I uploaded to JIRA. That
should fix the race condition in the unit tests, and prevent GUMP from
failing.
Thanks...
Bill-
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Bill Speirs wrote:
> Yea... it's a race condition, so it's not always going to tr
Yea... it's a race condition, so it's not always going to trigger.
I've updated to the latest version from SVN, but that is still broken.
I have a patch, but I guess it never made it through e-mail :-(
I'll have to send it tomorrow from work, but I'll submit it via JIRA.
Thanks...
Bill-
On Tue
version of
> the AsyncQueryRunnerTest, to make sure it compliant to what you
> submitted on Jira.
> Thanks a lot in advance, have a nice day!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Bill Speirs wrote:
>
ors: 0, Skipped: 0
So I'm having no issues on my end.
Let me know if I can help...
Bill-
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-09-27, Bill Speirs wrote:
>
>> So the issue has been fixed?
>
>> If not, can we get the output of
>> /s
So the issue has been fixed?
If not, can we get the output of
/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/dbutils/target/surefire-reports?
Thanks...
Bill-
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Stefan!!!
> I think so, you are right! I'm on a mac os x lion and I ran tests wit
Yea... I created these tests, and those values are not used. The DataSource
which is used to call the commands is mocked and will simply (and always)
return null.
Good catch...
Bill-
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> ouch, I was convinced I was fixing the async test :P
>
t; a release candidate.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Bill Speirs
> wrote:
> > Just wondering when this code will be released. I'm looking to use it in
> the
> > not-too-distant future for some stuff and I prefer to pull in all my deps
> >
nks Bill :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Bill Speirs
> wrote:
> > Sounds good... I'll open an enhancement request for async and submit my
> > code.
> >
> > The company I work for has SQL server and I will actually be using this
> lib
> >
IMO, saying "Don't do logging in a library" seems like a bad rule.
The HTTPComponents client has logging and it has been VERY helpful to be
able to turn on debug logging and see what requests and responses are going
over the wire. Yes, I could fire up Wireshark and get the same info, but
turning o
back in 2010.
>
> Neither of the two resolved items in 1.4 really justify a release, but
> a 1.3.1 might be worth it just to keep the release mechanisms going.
> Really only the one actionable issue exists (the recent DBUTILS-77)
> which suffers from the "so who has SQL Server?&
I started working on an async version of QueryRunner but noticed the dbutils
source hasn't been touched in 20 months. Are patches/enhancements still
being accepted on this project?
Thanks...
Bill-
22 matches
Mail list logo
