RE: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-05-14 Thread Andreas Persson
> FYI: I've updated VFS trunk to Java 6 to avoid getting stuck on older > versions of jars and further moving VFS in the 21st century ;) Tasked > as VFS-415. I was happy to see VFS-414 and VFS-313 being fixed, thank you very much for that! The change in VFS-415 however makes it impossible for us

Re: [VFS] SFTP UserDirIsRoot default value changed

2011-01-10 Thread Andreas Persson
> Yes, the patch that was provided to add sftp included this change. I can only > presume it was done to have the two match. Since I don't use FTP, SFTP or FTPS > and I didn't apply the patch I really can't say more and am not comfortable > saying whether it was the correct thing to do. You would

Re: [VFS] SFTP UserDirIsRoot default value changed

2011-01-07 Thread Andreas Persson
t the same for FTP?) So, was is a deliberate change or not? /Andreas -Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Andreas Persson [mailto:andreas.pers...@idainfront.se] Skickat: den 7 januari 2011 11:16 Till: dev@commons.apache.org Ämne: [VFS] SFTP UserDirIsRoot default value changed Hi, I n

[VFS] A wish for two patches to be accepted in 2.0

2011-01-07 Thread Andreas Persson
Is there any chance that the FTP related patches in VFS-182 and VFS-296 could be applied before the 2.0 release? We have used them for some time now in production systems without any problems. Both are small patches. VFS-182 is a new option for using ASCII transfer mode, and VFS-296 is a bug fi

[VFS] SFTP UserDirIsRoot default value changed

2011-01-07 Thread Andreas Persson
Hi, I notice that somewhere between revision r897835 and r1054676, the default user-dir-is-root behavior of the SFTP provider has changed from false to true. Was that an intentional change? I can't find any notice about it in the release notice or JIRA (I only find VFS-265, but that one is abou