Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
+1 and happy to help. On 22 November 2011 14:46, Phil Steitz wrote: > We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers > willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state. So I > would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. > > Votes, please. This vote

Re: [id] UUID

2011-11-22 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
I have a professional interest to get out a release of UUID as my current project would like to adopt it. I'd be more than happy to volunteer to help out/finish off the project so we can get it released. Cheers, Adrian. On 22 November 2011 13:55, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/22/11 8:38 AM, Jörg

Re: svn commit: r1194875 - in /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/enhance: LocalReferenceImpl.java OrderedReturn.java package-info.java

2011-10-29 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
I really wish that I wasn't old enough to remember the days of 1-3 character variable names and C++ style '_' variable name prefixing! There's quite a bit of that "retro" feel hanging around the OGNL code, I'll be joining Maurizio to help freshen that up a little in the coming days. Cheers, Adria

Re: svn commit: r1188790 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/ObjectPropertyAccessor.java

2011-10-25 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Nice one Maurizio, I must have missed that one when putting together the classloading patch, or perhaps it was lost in the cache merge? In any case a good a spot :-). Cheers, Adrian. On 25 October 2011 11:59, wrote: > Author: mcucchiara > Date: Tue Oct 25 16:59:54 2011 > New Revision: 1188790

Re: [OGNL] Unused classes

2011-10-25 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
HI Maurizio, IMO If it isn't used and it was only used internally then now is the time to remove it. Having looked at the class it certainly looks like a good candidate for removal. Cheers, Adrian. On 25 October 2011 11:20, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Hi guys, > after the introduction of the

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

2011-10-23 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
When I take a look at JIRA, Functor currently has only two open issues, one minor and one trivial. It would be good to capture all the outstanding work items that people feel are preventing a new RC. I would also be happy to contribute to improving Functor. Cheers, Adrian. On 23 October 2011 06

Re: [functor] deprecable ant build

2011-10-16 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
ct 16, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey > wrote: >> Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week, >> although Maven IDE support is generally pretty good I find it so verbose and >> un

Re: [functor] deprecable ant build

2011-10-16 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week, although Maven IDE support is generally pretty good I find it so verbose and unwieldy. This is probably not within scope of cutting a RC, but I'd recommend buildr, its so lightweight, low maintenance and extensible, and a