Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC3

2017-12-12 Thread Aaron Coburn
te:site) Checked OSGi metadata, checked deployment in Apache Karaf 4.1.2 Checked that NOTICE and LICENSE files are contained in each binary artifact. Thanks, Aaron Coburn acob...@apache.org On 12/7/17, 11:52 PM, "Sergio Fernández" wrote: Hi, once we addressed most of the i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2

2017-11-20 Thread Aaron Coburn
[X] +1 Release this package (non-binding) Built on OS X with Maven 3.5.2 and Java 1.8.0_151 NOTICE and LICENSE files are present in the source release Checked signatures Thanks for preparing this release, Aaron On 11/20/17, 7:27 AM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita" wrote: [ X ] +1 Release this pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

2017-11-01 Thread Aaron Coburn
to a more recent version of the plugin) with the japicmp plugin. These would be nice things to fix, but I don't see any reason that they need to hold up this release, as the JDK8-built artifacts work just fine when running in JDK9. Aaron Coburn acob...@apache.org On 11/1/17, 11:46 PM, &q

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

2017-10-20 Thread Aaron Coburn
Hello, I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe for the next release? Thanks, Aaron On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: Sergio, Thanks! The LDP server impl

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

2017-09-19 Thread Aaron Coburn
Hopefully I'll > have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based > LDP implementation? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaro

RDF Commons release?

2017-09-18 Thread Aaron Coburn
Hi! The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even a 0