On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 13:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:52, sebb wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:52, sebb wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> To make it clearer that 'Dormant'
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained,
> >> I
> >> think it would be
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained,
>> I
>> think it would be good if we marked GitHub repo's for those as 'Archived'.
>> AFAICS those a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained, I
> think it would be good if we marked GitHub repo's for those as 'Archived'.
> AFAICS those are:
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-chain
> https://github.c
Hi,
To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained, I
think it would be good if we marked GitHub repo's for those as 'Archived'.
AFAICS those are:
https://github.com/apache/commons-chain
https://github.com/apache/commons-functor
https://github.com/apache/commons-ognl
htt
