Re: [MATH][GA] Build Failure for PR #204

2022-01-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le lun. 31 janv. 2022 à 06:27, Avijit Basak a écrit : > > Hi All > > Please find my comments below. > > >There is no attachment (I think that the ML manager strips those). > >Please copy/paste the relevant part of the console log (or provide > >a link to it). > --The build was done

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi Mark, if your are going to roll another RC, would you mind calling cancel on this thread? TY, Gary On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 09:25 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > On the same topic, should we increase the version number to 1.3.0? > > Yes. > > Regards, > Gilles > > > [...] > > --

Re: [All] GSoC 2022

2022-01-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 à 18:09, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would be willing to go through GSOC again. Thanks; I know that back in 2020, it had been a disproportionate amount of work... > I think that the > statistics component could again serve as a project. There are some > packages in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > [...] > > On the same topic, should we increase the version number to 1.3.0? Yes. Regards, Gilles > [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Grammar: umping from 1.2.x to 1.3.0 seems appropriate *since* we updated from Java 6 to 7. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:34 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > Bumping from 1.2.x to 1.3.0 seems appropriate when we updated from Java 6 > to 7. > > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 7:42 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Bumping from 1.2.x to 1.3.0 seems appropriate when we updated from Java 6 to 7. Gary On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 7:42 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 27/01/2022 22:29, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Xeno Amess
> changing the minimum Java version in a point release doesn't seem right. agreed. Mark Thomas 于2022年1月31日周一 20:42写道: > On 27/01/2022 22:29, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. > > > >[ ] +1 Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/01/2022 22:29, Mark Thomas wrote: Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts   [ ] +0 OK, but...   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...   [X] -1 I oppose this release because... The minimum Java

Re: [MATH][GA] Build Failure for PR #204

2022-01-31 Thread Alex Herbert
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 05:26, Avijit Basak wrote: > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.2.0:javadoc (default-cli) > on project commons-math4-legacy: An error has occurred in Javadoc report > generation: > [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - > C:\Personal\Work\ope

JDK 18 Rampdown Phase 2 & JDK 19 Early-Access Builds

2022-01-31 Thread David Delabassee
Greetings! First off, on behalf of Oracle’s Java Team, I’d like to wish you a happy and prosperous new year! In 2022, two Java releases will be made available: - JDK 18 (March 2022) - JDK 19 (September 2022) JDK 18[1] has entered Rampdown Phase Two (RDP2)[2]. Given that and to be better prep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Mark Thomas
On 30/01/2022 17:38, Gary Gregory wrote: There is nothing at this link link: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/1.2.5-RC1 My mistake. The correct URL is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/ The release process didn't create the structure for dist. I did i