I have removed the requirement for Java 9 from the build. It is still used
in the performance testing module.
Alex
Note that the test could inspect the java version,
or use reflection to see if the method BigDecimal.sqrt() exists...
-r
Randy Strauss, cell: 650-861-1537
On 6/9/21, 2:57 PM, "sebb" wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:58, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:56, sebb wrote
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:58, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:56, sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:26, Alex Herbert
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:03, John Patrick
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I've c
Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 20:58, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:56, sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:26, Alex Herbert
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:03, John Patrick
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'v
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:56, sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:26, Alex Herbert
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:03, John Patrick
> wrote:
> >
> > > Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
> > >
> >
> > I've corrected that in the pom, thanks.
> >
> > I think the issue is that Gilles
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:26, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:03, John Patrick wrote:
>
> > Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
> >
>
> I've corrected that in the pom, thanks.
>
> I think the issue is that Gilles used JDK 8 to try and build it. You can
> run using the project's m
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:03, John Patrick wrote:
> Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
>
I've corrected that in the pom, thanks.
I think the issue is that Gilles used JDK 8 to try and build it. You can
run using the project's main artifacts using JDK 8, but the build now
requires JDK 9 for the
Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
I believe the 1.x was dropped with Java 9's release.
Also might want to bump it to Java 11 as that is a LTS release, as 9
was only supported for 6 months from september 2017 to march 2018.
Also with 9 and newer, maven.compiler.source/maven.compiler.target
have
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 16:07, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > The math project does not build with the default goal in the pom:
> >
> > clean verify apache-rat:check checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check
> > javadoc:javadoc
> >
> > There
Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 16:07, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> The math project does not build with the default goal in the pom:
>
> clean verify apache-rat:check checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check
> javadoc:javadoc
>
> There is a spotbugs error in the Artificial neural networks module due to a
>
Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 16:10, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:02, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:58, Alex Herbert a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > I'm doing it...
> >
>
> OK. I was trying to fix the math build using the default maven goal.
> Currently there are i
Hi.
"Commons Numbers" POM of module "commons-numbers-core"
contains
---CUT---
1.9
1.9
---CUT---
Running
$ JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/ mvn test site site:stage
fails:
---CUT---
[...]
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:t
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:02, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:58, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> I'm doing it...
>
OK. I was trying to fix the math build using the default maven goal.
Currently there are issues. See separate e-mail thread on the CI build
goals.
I've pushed the
The math project does not build with the default goal in the pom:
clean verify apache-rat:check checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check
javadoc:javadoc
There is a spotbugs error in the Artificial neural networks module due to a
case statement fall through. This is intentional so I added an excl
Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:58, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:55, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:49, Erik Svensson a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I’m trying and failing to build commons-math and it looks like the cla
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:55, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:49, Erik Svensson a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m trying and failing to build commons-math and it looks like the class
> LinearCombination is either in the wrong package.
> >
> > In DerivativeSt
Hello.
Le mer. 9 juin 2021 à 15:49, Erik Svensson a écrit :
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> I’m trying and failing to build commons-math and it looks like the class
> LinearCombination is either in the wrong package.
>
> In DerivativeStructure for instance, LinearCombination is declared as
> org.apache.commons
Hi!
I’m trying and failing to build commons-math and it looks like the class
LinearCombination is either in the wrong package.
In DerivativeStructure for instance, LinearCombination is declared as
org.apache.commons.numbers.arrays.LinearCombination instead of
org.apache.commons.numbers.core.Lin
18 matches
Mail list logo
