Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

>>> [...] > > > > OK to create the > > commons-site > > "git" repository? > > Are you offering to do the work? If the option is still on the table, I could test the website-related feature of ".asf.yaml": https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#git.asf.y

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 19:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le lun. 26 avr. 2021 à 17:08, Ralph Goers a > écrit : > > > > See below > > > > > On Apr 18, 2021, at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 18:40, Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

Le lun. 26 avr. 2021 à 17:08, Ralph Goers a écrit : > > See below > > > On Apr 18, 2021, at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 18:40, Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > >> > >> Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 15:38, sebb a écrit : > >>> > >>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 a

Re: The case for a Commons component

Le lun. 26 avr. 2021 à 17:08, Ralph Goers a écrit : > > How many committers will be active for this component? No less than there were for [RNG], [Numbers] and [Geometry]. ;-) Those new components have attracted high-quality contributions; two of the people who provided them have become committe

Re: The case for a Commons component

Le dim. 25 avr. 2021 à 16:27, sebb a écrit : > > I assume this thread is about the possible ML component. I hesitated with Subject: "The case for *any* Commons component". > If the code was developed by Commons, I assume it could be used as > part of Spark. > However Commons does not currently h

Re: The case for a Commons component

How many committers will be active for this component? Ralph > On Apr 26, 2021, at 7:17 AM, Avijit Basak wrote: > > Hi > >As per previous discussions, I have created a temporary repository > in GitHub under my personal GitHub Id(avijitbasak). The artifacts have been > copied from commo

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

See below > On Apr 18, 2021, at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 18:40, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: >> >> Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 15:38, sebb a écrit : >>> >>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:40, Gary Gregory wrote: Note that git also has its git

Re: The case for a Commons component

Hi As per previous discussions, I have created a temporary repository in GitHub under my personal GitHub Id(avijitbasak). The artifacts have been copied from commons-numbers. A preliminary structure has been created for the proposed component. Please let me know if we want to proceed with

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

Hi. [Not replying to the previously last message in the thread but a heads-up following Bruno's reminder about ".asf.yaml" and Ralph's mention of it earlier in this thread.] Could we start from the bottom-up, i.e. create a git repository for hosting each component's web site? Then we can graduall