If building on Jenkins, it looks like Infra still supports all the way
back to 1.4:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Installation+Matrix
On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 16:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> As a guideline I think our CI builds should use the following Java versi
Hi All:
As a guideline I think our CI builds should use the following Java versions:
- Java 8 since it is LTS
- Java 11 since it is LTS
- Java 14 since it is the latest version
- Java 15-ea since it is upcoming, but should be allowed to fail a build
- Java 16-ea since it is upcomin
Hi.
Thanks for detailing your POV. However...
Le dim. 26 juil. 2020 à 19:08, Melloware a écrit :
>
> I know there seems to to be a holy war
"holy war" certainly not.
The notion of "independence" would be appropriate.
> about the use of GitHub going on
> here but I thought I would just chime i
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le dim. 26 juil. 2020 à 19:58, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>>
>> I haven’t read all that’s going on here. But in my mind we treat GitHub as a
>> first class citizen, right?
>
> Depends on what that means.
> As Matt said, it's our PR man
Le dim. 26 juil. 2020 à 19:58, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
> I haven’t read all that’s going on here. But in my mind we treat GitHub as a
> first class citizen, right?
Depends on what that means.
As Matt said, it's our PR manager.
> We’re trying quite hard intact to make it our main working repo
Hello.
Le dim. 26 juil. 2020 à 19:04, Xeno Amess a écrit :
>
> I thought it was obvious so I didn't do the benchmark.
Performance is so *not* obvious that JMH prints a warning in its
output. [So even if the numbers don't match your expectation,
you might be right anyway, in some use-cases, or i
I haven’t read all that’s going on here. But in my mind we treat GitHub as a
first class citizen, right? We’re trying quite hard intact to make it our main
working repo infrastructure.
That said, there is an Apache policy that we maintain workable copies of
everything on owned infrastructure.
I know there seems to to be a holy war about the use of GitHub going on
here but I thought I would just chime in with some thoughts as an open
source developer and avid user of GitHub. There have been so many
different points I will only discuss a few that I think are important.
1. GitHub is t
I thought it was obvious so I didn't do the benchmark.
You need it so I've done it now.
pinned at https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/565
Gilles Sadowski 于2020年7月26日周日 下午11:48写道：
> 2020-07-26 17:34 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> > Thanks for the suggestions about JIRA message and commit style
2020-07-26 17:34 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> Thanks for the suggestions about JIRA message and commit style.
> Will find some time to refine the texts.
>
>> ... randomly picking LANG-1576 (sorry if the others don't fit the
>> following), I'll stress again that there are more important things
>> to do
Thanks for the suggestions about JIRA message and commit style.
Will find some time to refine the texts.
> ... randomly picking LANG-1576 (sorry if the others don't fit the
> following), I'll stress again that there are more important things
> to do before such (supposed) performance enhancement.
Hi Xeno.
2020-07-26 13:10 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
>>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only
>>> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have
> only
>>> two committers in commons-lang.
>
>> Are there JIRA reports?
>
> My log here is:
>
> LA
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Don't you mean Java 8? Are you suggesting that Lang 4 would be based on
> Java 11?
Oh...yes, pardon I don’t count correctly sometimes :-p
>
> Gary
>
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 10:12 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Jul 26, 2020
Well, French is first my language, so we are in the ESL boat together ;-) I
am glad we can converse in a shared language, and it does not have to be
Latin or esperanto!
Gary
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 10:13 Peter Lee wrote:
> It's why apache and open source is so charming and why we all love this so
Don't you mean Java 8? Are you suggesting that Lang 4 would be based on
Java 11?
Gary
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 10:12 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 26, 2020, at 7:43 AM, Xeno Amess wrote:
> >
> > btw, is there a roadmap/timeline for 4.0?
> > And will we continue maintaining 3.x then?
>
> I w
It's why apache and open source is so charming and why we all love this so
much. :-)
cheers,
Lee
On 7 26 2020, at 10:04 , Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 26, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Peter Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stefan, Rob, Gilles, Gary and all,
> >
> > Please calm.
> > I was just talking that I'
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2020, at 7:43 AM, Xeno Amess wrote:
>>
>> btw, is there a roadmap/timeline for 4.0?
>> And will we continue maintaining 3.x then?
>
> I would think 4.0 might happen in conjunction with the release of Java 17
> (the
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 7:43 AM, Xeno Amess wrote:
>
> btw, is there a roadmap/timeline for 4.0?
> And will we continue maintaining 3.x then?
I would think 4.0 might happen in conjunction with the release of Java 17 (the
next expected LTS version I’ve seen for java). I think that’s when we ca
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Peter Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan, Rob, Gilles, Gary and all,
>
> Please calm.
> I was just talking that I'm so busy recently ( Too busy in the daytime that I
> got home after 12p.m. these days :( ) .I didn't check my mailbox after my
> last replay in this threa
Hi Stefan, Rob, Gilles, Gary and all,
Please calm.
I was just talking that I'm so busy recently ( Too busy in the daytime that I
got home after 12p.m. these days :( ) .I didn't check my mailbox after my last
replay in this thread. Really sorry for my late reply.
I'm not complaining. I personally
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Xeno Amess wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only
>>> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have
> only
>>> two committers in commons-lang.
>
>> Are there JIRA reports?
>
> My log
There are no plans that I know of right now for 4.0 except that we know we
want to drop deprecated code.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 07:36 Xeno Amess wrote:
> btw, is there a roadmap/timeline for 4.0?
> And will we continue maintaining 3.x then?
>
> Gary Gregory 于2020年7月26日周日 下午7:25写道：
>
> > No
btw, is there a roadmap/timeline for 4.0?
And will we continue maintaining 3.x then?
Gary Gregory 于2020年7月26日周日 下午7:25写道：
> Note that Lang does not and should not depend on Text for example. Some
> classes that are in Lang now have been deprecated in favor of similar
> functionality in Text, the
Note that Lang does not and should not depend on Text for example. Some
classes that are in Lang now have been deprecated in favor of similar
functionality in Text, the Str[ing]Substitutor packages for instance. We
can remove that Lang code in 4.0.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 04:16 Bruno P. Kinosh
>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only
>> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have
only
>> two committers in commons-lang.
> Are there JIRA reports?
My log here is:
LANG-1545 merged by gary
LANG-1561 merged by gary
LANG-1563 merged
2020-07-26 5:00 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
>>GitHub is basically our interactive pull request interface. If we didn’t
> have that, I bet we’d be running GitLab ourselves or similar.
>
> Yes, that is what I think gitbox lacks.
As Matt says above, the functionality is there. As noted in my
previous me
Not following the thread, but from your explanation it sounds OK to me. There
are other parts of Lang that could do with some trimming for a future 4.x
release I think, either moving some code to other components or suggesting the
use of JVM code (e.g. some of the date/time methods).
Bruno
27 matches
Mail list logo
