2020-06-07 23:28 UTC+02:00, Gilles Sadowski :
> Hi.
>
> I recall that we should move the SVN repository to there:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/_moved_to_git/
>
> Does someone remember how to do it?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/commons/MovingToGit
But seems outdat
Hi.
I recall that we should move the SVN repository to there:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/_moved_to_git/
Does someone remember how to do it?
Thanks,
Gilles
Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 23:19, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> Hello.
>
> Repository available:
> https://gitbox.apache.
Hello.
Repository available:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Thanks Amey. I am aware of the Javadoc warnings, I just did not want to
take the time to address them. Please feel free though ;-)
Gary
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 11:21 Amey Jadiye wrote:
> +1 Release these artifacts
>
> Everything looks good to me. Build passing on java 8 and 11. Tests, Rat,
> Japi
+1 Release these artifacts
Everything looks good to me. Build passing on java 8 and 11. Tests, Rat,
Japicmp, checkstyle passing fine.
1. Apologies, I might have missed discussions but I don't understand
reason behind @Ignore on JiraBcel291TestCase and skipping it from test
suite.
[INFO] Running
Hi.
Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 15:07, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> The current flood of email messages from GitHub is not sustainable
> for me (sorry).
I'm not registered on GitHub; hence even when I agree with your
proposed changes (e.g. PR #152), I cannot comment directly over
there.
In
Hi.
Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 12:54, Xeno Amess a écrit :
>
> Ahhh you are right.
> I'm new to JIRA. sory
I'll take the opportunity to draw your attention to pending issues in
"Commons Math"[1] that would prevent releasing the next version.
It's great that you want to clean up the codebase, but
Ahhh you are right.
I'm new to JIRA. sory
Gilles Sadowski 于2020年6月7日周日 下午6:50写道：
> Hi.
>
> 2020-06-07 8:21 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> > If you are telling about 144:
> > yes, original codes runs like:
> > f[0] = f0;
> > f[1] = f1;
> > f[2] = f[2-2] = f[0] = f[0]
> > f[3] = f[3-2] = f[1] = f[1
Hi.
2020-06-07 8:21 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> If you are telling about 144:
> yes, original codes runs like:
> f[0] = f0;
> f[1] = f1;
> f[2] = f[2-2] = f[0] = f[0]
> f[3] = f[3-2] = f[1] = f[1]
> f[4] = f[4-2] = f[2] = f[0]
> f[5] = f[5-2] = f[3] = f[1]
>
> the new codes runs like:
> f[0] = f0;
>
