[VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC1

We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8. Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/dbutils/1.8

Re: Proposal to Release

Thanks for adding that version. I’ll work on marking tickets that are in this release. There have been a few API additions, requiring Java 1.7 instead of 1.6, and the addition of a new annotation. It feels like enough to go with 1.8 rather than 1.7.1, but I’m open to stronger opinions. > On J

Re: Proposal to Release

If you guys can’t sort it out by tomorrow evening, I can roll 1.8. -Rob > On Jan 4, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I added 1.8 but the it could be changed to 1.7.1 if no new API is added. > > Gary > >> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 18:40 Carl Hall wrote: >> >> I don’t seem to have the ri

Re: Proposal to Release

I added 1.8 but the it could be changed to 1.7.1 if no new API is added. Gary On Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 18:40 Carl Hall wrote: > I don’t seem to have the right permissions to create a release in Jira for > DbUtils[1]. Could someone grant me those permissions, or create a 1.8 > release, please? Than

Re: Proposal to Release

I don’t seem to have the right permissions to create a release in Jira for DbUtils[1]. Could someone grant me those permissions, or create a 1.8 release, please? Thanks! https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/DBUTILS?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin%3Arelease-page&status=no-f

Fwd: [Geometry] Class "Equivalency"

Forwarding to ML. Gilles P.S. Please don't send to me directly when the post is meant for the list, as otherwise hitting "Reply" will move the conversation off-list... -- Forwarded message - De : Gilles Sadowski Date: sam. 4 janv. 2020 à 19:54 Subject: Re: [Geometry] Class "Equi

Re: [Geometry] Class "Equivalency"

Gilles, I removed the Equivalency interface and pushed the changes to my current PR, along with some changes related to the shape-generation classes (GEOMETRY-83). In regard to renaming "eq" to "equals", I personally prefer "eq" (short for "equivalent") to make it more distinct from "equals". T

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Apache Commons Codec 1.14

The Apache Commons Codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats such as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to these widely used encoders and decoders, the codec package also maintains a collection of phonetic encoding utilities. Feature and fix release. Changes in this

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

On 2020-01-04, Gary Gregory wrote: > Java has a service leader mechanism for that. No sense in duplicating it. Compress already supports that, and IIRC you've added that yourself :-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

Java has a service leader mechanism for that. No sense in duplicating it. If that means updating to Java 8, then so be it. Gary On Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 07:58 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 04/01/2020 à 12:19, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > This won't work as CompressorStreamFactory depends on the pack

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

Le 04/01/2020 à 12:19, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > This won't work as CompressorStreamFactory depends on the package. Maybe some reflection could address that? > https://github.com/pack200/pack200 looks pretty public to me :-) I've just pushed a raw extraction of the OpenJDK code with its histo

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 11:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2020-01-04, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > Le 02/01/2020 à 11:06, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > >> Any other ideas? > > > The removal of pack200 isn't an issue for the upcoming release yet since > > we still target Java 7. For now this is just a

Re: [Geometry] Class "Equivalency"

Hello. 2020-01-04 6:10 UTC+01:00, Matt Juntunen : > Gilles, > > I took another look at the code and it turns out we can easily remove the > entire Equivalency interface and just use methods of the form "eq(T, > DoublePrecisionContext)", exactly the same way that the VectorXD classes do > it now. T

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

On 2020-01-04, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 02/01/2020 à 11:06, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> Any other ideas? > The removal of pack200 isn't an issue for the upcoming release yet since > we still target Java 7. For now this is just an issue with the CI using > Java 14+. Maybe we can deal with this

Re: [compress] What to do with Pack200?

Le 02/01/2020 à 11:06, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > Any other ideas? The removal of pack200 isn't an issue for the upcoming release yet since we still target Java 7. For now this is just an issue with the CI using Java 14+. Maybe we can deal with this by using a Maven profile excluding the pack200