Re: [Numbers] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Alex Herbert
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, 17:58 Gilles Sadowski, wrote: > Hello. > > Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:33, Eric Barnhill a > écrit : > > > > It seems like we're pretty close. > > > > I can take a look at 136, 137 related to log. I have had trouble finding > > the space to launch the regression project. But I c

Re: [Geometry] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Matt Juntunen
Gilles, I definitely agree that getting a beta release out there would be good in order to gain attention and get input from more users on the API. I don't think any of those issues I listed would be indispensable to such a release. However, it might be a good idea to 1) remove GeometryException

Re: [Geometry] Coveralls stuck

2019-12-03 Thread Alex Herbert
On 03/12/2019 18:25, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 19:21, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 03/12/2019 16:43, Alex Herbert wrote: ... I am going to try option 1. Seems to be fixed now. Thanks! Gilles The same config fix may be needed in statistics and numbers. I'll check those

Re: [Geometry] Coveralls stuck

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 19:21, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 03/12/2019 16:43, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > ... > > > > I am going to try option 1. > > Seems to be fixed now. Thanks! Gilles > > Alex > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [Geometry] Coveralls stuck

2019-12-03 Thread Alex Herbert
On 03/12/2019 16:43, Alex Herbert wrote: ... I am going to try option 1. Seems to be fixed now. Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.

Re: [Statistics] New component for (standard) distributions?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:41, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > Sorry I misspoke. Anyway I quite agree, it would work well as > commons-distribution. +1 No problem. :) If you have time, some "little" things would be: * review the distribution classes and ensure that the conventions are uniform

Re: [Geometry] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Matt. Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:37, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > I just added a number of new issues to JIRA. The ones that I would consider > required for a 1.0 release are: > > -GEOMETRY-67 - OutlineExtractor > -GEOMETRY-68 - Raycast/Linecast API > -GEOMETRY-69 - BSPTreeVisitor stop visit > -

Re: [Numbers] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:33, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > It seems like we're pretty close. > > I can take a look at 136, 137 related to log. I have had trouble finding > the space to launch the regression project. But I could work on some > smaller things. Great. ;-) > > Regarding 70, th

Re: [Statistics] New component for (standard) distributions?

2019-12-03 Thread Eric Barnhill
Sorry I misspoke. Anyway I quite agree, it would work well as commons-distribution. +1 On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:29 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:23, Eric Barnhill a > écrit : > > > > I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported. > > > > You are proposing

Re: [Geometry] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Matt Juntunen
I just added a number of new issues to JIRA. The ones that I would consider required for a 1.0 release are: -GEOMETRY-67 - OutlineExtractor -GEOMETRY-68 - Raycast/Linecast API -GEOMETRY-69 - BSPTreeVisitor stop visit -GEOMETRY-72 - Boundary API -GEOMETRY-77 - BoundsXD classes -GEOMETRY-73 - Creat

Re: [Numbers] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Eric Barnhill
It seems like we're pretty close. I can take a look at 136, 137 related to log. I have had trouble finding the space to launch the regression project. But I could work on some smaller things. Regarding 70, the user guide, what do you think of submitting an application to Google Season of Docs? I

Re: [Statistics] New component for (standard) distributions?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:23, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported. > > You are proposing releasing it outside of numbers? Code is currently in module "commons-statistics-distribution", within the [Statistics] component (actually: the sole non-emp

Re: [Geometry] Exceptions hierarchy

2019-12-03 Thread Matt Juntunen
I suppose I could get on board with removing the GeometryException base class and only using JDK exceptions in the public API. I think the best exceptions in that case would be IllegalArgumentException and IllegalStateException, depending on the specific case. -Matt

Re: [Statistics] New component for (standard) distributions?

2019-12-03 Thread Eric Barnhill
I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported. You are proposing releasing it outside of numbers? I think it's a good idea. +1 On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Most functionality of the "o.a.c.math4.distribution" package was migrated > from Commons Ma

Re: [Numbers] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Alex Herbert
On 03/12/2019 15:41, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. What do you think of releasing "Commons Numbers"? Please have a look at the list of pending issues.[1] I did not finish work on Complex. I have some more tests to push from a local dev branch that increase the C99 compliance. I have not yet

Re: [Geometry] Coveralls stuck

2019-12-03 Thread Alex Herbert
On 03/12/2019 14:59, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Any idea why Coveralls does not pick up the latest build for "Commons Geometry" https://coveralls.io/github/apache/commons-geometry?branch=master ? Coverage is quite good in fact: https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=commons-geometry

Re: [Geometry] Exceptions hierarchy

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. 2019-12-03 17:13 UTC+01:00, Matt Juntunen : > Hello, > > I don't feel like ArithmeticException quite captures all of the possible > geometry exception states. For example, it seems odd to me to throw an > ArithmeticException when a plane cannot be constructed due to a given set of > points

[Geometry] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Are there blocking issues? Would i be useful to release a "beta" version? Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Geometry] Exceptions hierarchy

2019-12-03 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hello, I don't feel like ArithmeticException quite captures all of the possible geometry exception states. For example, it seems odd to me to throw an ArithmeticException when a plane cannot be constructed due to a given set of points being collinear [1]. That idea feels beyond the concept of "

[Statistics] New component for (standard) distributions?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Most functionality of the "o.a.c.math4.distribution" package was migrated from Commons Math almost 2 years ago. The [Statistics] component should also host a refactoring of CM's "stat" package but development has stalled. Obviously, it is unlikely that we can perform this task in the short

[Numbers] Towards a release?

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. What do you think of releasing "Commons Numbers"? Please have a look at the list of pending issues.[1] Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NUMBERS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.0%20AND%20statusCategory%20%3D%20new

[Geometry] Coveralls stuck

2019-12-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Any idea why Coveralls does not pick up the latest build for "Commons Geometry" https://coveralls.io/github/apache/commons-geometry?branch=master ? Coverage is quite good in fact: https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=commons-geometry Regards, Gilles -