Under target/site
Gary
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 11:41 Mark Roberts wrote:
> To respond to questions about changes to Annotation support, I am trying
> to review the current test coverage. I ran the command line below. I see
> a file named jacoco.exec but that appears to be binary data. Where d
To respond to questions about changes to Annotation support, I am trying to
review the current test coverage. I ran the command line below. I see a file
named jacoco.exec but that appears to be binary data. Where do I find the
code coverage report?
Thanks,
Mark
From: Gary Gregory [m
Also toward 2.0, we need to collapse:
org.apache.commons.beanutils2.BeanUtilsBean
org.apache.commons.beanutils2.BeanUtilsBean2
and
org.apache.commons.beanutils2.ConvertUtilsBean
org.apache.commons.beanutils2.ConvertUtilsBean2
and probably add classes in org.apache.commons.beanutils2.converters
I have been using semver for Commons components I am involved. I think we
are pretty good in general about it... YMMV ;-)
Gary
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:59 AM Claude Warren wrote:
> I think there is a belief in the general using public that Apache follows
> SemVer for most Java code. I think t
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:53 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 17/10/2019 à 19:45, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> > It seems like org.apache.commons.collections4.Predicate can/should be
> > replaced by java.util.function.Function
>
> Did we consider modifying collections4 such that Predicate extends
> Fu
I think there is a belief in the general using public that Apache follows
SemVer for most Java code. I think that it would be best if each module
specified if it follows SemVer or not -- just to clear up any confusion on
the part of the user.
Claude
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:08 PM Stefan Bodewig
