Re: [Commons] Error : Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8

Oracle JDK 8 is a commercial product at this point, isn’t it? OpenJDK 8 should be mostly equivalent, and starting at some later point, they’re the same. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 19:26, Virendra singh Rajpurohit < virendrasing...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm working on Commons-Statistics, and

[Commons] Error : Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8

Hi all, I'm working on Commons-Statistics, and my PR failed with the following error: [image: travis-error.PNG] It failed for "oraclejdk8 " but worked fine with "openjdk8

Re: [commons-dbcp] branch master updated: [DBCP-547] Add a ConnectionFactory class name setting for BasicDataSource.createConnectionFactory() #33.

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:44 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > Thanks, Mark! I’m in complete agreement on your formatting philosophy here > (consistency over bikeshedding). And also kinda like the new line after > operator, too, though no strong opinion there since I seem to forget which > style I prefer s

Re: [collections][vfs] releases

FYI: I am planning to prepare an RC for Commons VFS very soon. Gary On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:57 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > FYI, I think I'd like to release Collections and then VFS next. > > Gary >

Re: [commons-dbcp] branch master updated: [DBCP-547] Add a ConnectionFactory class name setting for BasicDataSource.createConnectionFactory() #33.

Thanks, Mark! I’m in complete agreement on your formatting philosophy here (consistency over bikeshedding). And also kinda like the new line after operator, too, though no strong opinion there since I seem to forget which style I prefer sometimes. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:21, Mark Thomas wrote:

Re: [commons-dbcp] branch master updated: [DBCP-547] Add a ConnectionFactory class name setting for BasicDataSource.createConnectionFactory() #33.

On 10/07/2019 22:47, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:52 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 10/07/2019 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> Without arguing about the merits of one kind of formatting vs. another... >>> If you can configure the Eclipse formatter to do that, I'd consider it,

Configuration diff

Greetings, I was just working on an issue for work and discovered that we really needed a configuration diff. Something that will compare key values between two configurations. The result would be an object that would tell you all the differences for either configuration and perhaps a pretty pr