Re: [ALL][DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report for June 2019

> On Jun 14, 2019, at 7:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Carman > wrote: > >> Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me, because of >> the work stuff. Thanks >> > > YW. I will post to board@ later today. Generally many thanks for

Re: [daemon] release plans

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:23 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/06/2019 20:43, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 14/06/2019 20:39, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > >>> On 14/06/2019 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > This one: https://github.com/apache/commons

Re: Method should be static

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:42 PM wrote: > This one was meant to hc dev list? > Oops. Gary > > Best regards. > > On 14/06/2019 20:47, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > org.apache.http.HttpVersion.forVersion(int, int) should be a static > method. > > I'll create a PR... > > > > Gary > > >

Re: Method should be static

This one was meant to hc dev list? Best regards. On 14/06/2019 20:47, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > org.apache.http.HttpVersion.forVersion(int, int) should be a static method. > I'll create a PR... > > Gary > - To unsubsc

Re: [daemon] release plans

On 14/06/2019 20:43, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/06/2019 20:39, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 14/06/2019 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: This one: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/11 >>> >>> Review for what? Looks pretty uncontrover

Method should be static

Hi All: org.apache.http.HttpVersion.forVersion(int, int) should be a static method. I'll create a PR... Gary

Re: [daemon] release plans

On 14/06/2019 20:39, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 14/06/2019 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> This one: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/11 >> >> Review for what? Looks pretty uncontroversial to me. >> > > I've not taken the time to

Re: [daemon] release plans

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/06/2019 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > > This one: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/11 > > Review for what? Looks pretty uncontroversial to me. > I've not taken the time to setup my new laptop to build the C part of this proje

Re: [daemon] release plans

On 14/06/2019 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > This one: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/11 Review for what? Looks pretty uncontroversial to me. Mark > > Gary > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 15:24 Gary Gregory wrote: > >> I created a PR a couple of days ago that needs a review. >> >> Ga

Re: [daemon] release plans

This one: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/11 Gary On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 15:24 Gary Gregory wrote: > I created a PR a couple of days ago that needs a review. > > Gary > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 12:34 Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 12/06/2019 14:23, Mark Thomas wrote: >> > On 12/06/2019

Re: [daemon] release plans

I created a PR a couple of days ago that needs a review. Gary On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 12:34 Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12/06/2019 14:23, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 12/06/2019 14:09, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Hi All: > >> > >> I am pleased to see renewed activity in Commons Daemon. > >> > >> Are there

Re: [daemon] release plans

On 12/06/2019 14:23, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12/06/2019 14:09, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hi All: >> >> I am pleased to see renewed activity in Commons Daemon. >> >> Are there any release thoughts? > > https://commons.markmail.org/thread/qklsh7jg3qwo2uf3 I've addressed the issues I plan to before the

Re: [lang][rng] org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.shuffle()

+1 to updating RNG to Java 8 Gary On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:45 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > > On 14/06/2019 13:29, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 12:57, Alex Herbert > wrote: > >> > >> On 14/06/2019 12:01, sebb wrote: > >>> I meant that the iterator would use the shuffled and/or selected

Re: [lang][rng] org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.shuffle()

On 14/06/2019 13:29, sebb wrote: On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 12:57, Alex Herbert wrote: On 14/06/2019 12:01, sebb wrote: I meant that the iterator would use the shuffled and/or selected indices to return the appropriate entry from the original array. No need to modify the original array. To shu

Re: [lang][rng] org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.shuffle()

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 12:57, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > On 14/06/2019 12:01, sebb wrote: > > I meant that the iterator would use the shuffled and/or selected > > indices to return the appropriate entry from the original array. > > > > No need to modify the original array. > > To shuffle an array r

Re: [lang][rng] org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.shuffle()

On 14/06/2019 12:01, sebb wrote: I meant that the iterator would use the shuffled and/or selected indices to return the appropriate entry from the original array. No need to modify the original array. To shuffle an array requires storage as elements are swapped. Either store an index or sto

Re: [ALL][DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report for June 2019

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Carman wrote: > Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me, because of > the work stuff. Thanks > YW. I will post to board@ later today. Gary > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:51

Re: [lang][rng] org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.shuffle()

I meant that the iterator would use the shuffled and/or selected indices to return the appropriate entry from the original array. No need to modify the original array. On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 18:15, Eric Barnhill wrote: > > An iterator that dynamically shuffles as you go along. That's really nic