> > Hi.
> >
> > I see that you use Java 11.
> > Can you try with a different version?
> > We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9.
> >
> > Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix
> > that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10).
>
> I think
> On 23 Mar 2019, at 17:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I see that you use Java 11.
> Can you try with a different version?
> We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9.
>
> Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix
> that issue (confirmed
Hi.
I see that you use Java 11.
Can you try with a different version?
We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9.
Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix
that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10).
Regards,
Gilles
Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 1
>Well, you did not ask anything to maven and it told you so.
>You should run
> mvn -e package
Oh.
Here is the data that comes after $mvn -e package
[INFO] Apache Commons RNG Core FAILURE [ 2.164 s]
[INFO] Apache Commons RNG Simple .. SKIPPED
Hello.
Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 16:35, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit :
>
> Dear Sir,
> After running $mvn package, I get:
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 19:08 min
> [INFO] Finished at: 2019-03-22T23:23:39+
Dear Sir,
After running $mvn package, I get:
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 19:08 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-03-22T23:23:39+05:30
[INFO] --
Killer. Nice work.
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 8:58 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> the PR has been merged and I've created a multi branch pipeline [1]. I've
> used the configuration from the PLC4X project because I know they were
> among the first to use pipeline files. I recommend that we le
Hi!
the PR has been merged and I've created a multi branch pipeline [1]. I've
used the configuration from the PLC4X project because I know they were
among the first to use pipeline files. I recommend that we let this build
for a while to get a feeling whether this works the way we want. If it does
Am 22. März 2019 19:56:29 MEZ schrieb Gary Gregory :
>On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:53 PM sebb wrote:
>
>> I see no reason to update to Java 8 unless continuing with Java 7
>> becomes a big hassle.
>>
>> Why penalise people stuck on Java 7 unnecessarily?
>>
>
>I see it the other way around: Why do
Hi Abhishek.
Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 19:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> >Well then, I guess that we consider the micro-tasks which I evoked in
>
> my previous message: Clone the repository and build the code.
>
> This is explained in more details here:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/
10 matches
Mail list logo
