visruth opened a new pull request #7: get generated keys from
queryRunner.insertBatch
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-dbutils/pull/7
This class will be useful to get generated keys from the
queryRunner.insertBatch operation.
Eg:-
```
ResultSetHandler> rsh = new Scala
Good idea. Another user commented something similar in the pull request, and I
believe Rob's suggestion was in the same direction.
Here's a PR that fixes clirr and deprecates a few things for 2.0:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/102
Thanks!
Bruno
On Wednesday, 20 February 201
Same for me. Just provided a solution to unblock 1.7, but happy to go with a
2.0 if we others agree too.
I haven't followed much around the Java modules. But this is a good opportunity
to fix anything required for the new Java versions.
CheersBruno
On Thursday, 21 February 2019, 10:59:11 am
kinow commented on issue #102: TEXT-104: deprecate JaroWinkler methods for 2.0,
and fix clirr report
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/102#issuecomment-465772523
Clirr report:
wrote:
Is this a LAZY VOTE?
Gary
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:36 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1
>
> (Note. We still need to have the github messages either land on an email
> list or generate jira’s for traceability. I almo
Is this a LAZY VOTE?
Gary
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:36 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1
>
> (Note. We still need to have the github messages either land on an email
> list or generate jira’s for traceability. I almost think that we should
> have Pull Requests generate jiras.)
>
> > On Feb 19, 2019,
+1
(Note. We still need to have the github messages either land on an email list
or generate jira’s for traceability. I almost think that we should have Pull
Requests generate jiras.)
> On Feb 19, 2019, at 4:35 PM, Marcelo Vanzin
> wrote:
>
> I'm opening a vote based on recent discussions ab
> On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:42 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Am Mi., 20. Feb. 2019 um 08:58 Uhr schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita <
> ki...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Just finished merging a pull request to TEXT-104, where the JaroWinkler
>> distance was updated. The class was actually computing a te
Am Mi., 20. Feb. 2019 um 08:58 Uhr schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita <
ki...@apache.org>:
> Hi all,
> Just finished merging a pull request to TEXT-104, where the JaroWinkler
> distance was updated. The class was actually computing a text similarity
> score, not an edit distance. The user that contributed
I'm happy about the positive feedback. I'm currently a little bit busy at
work. I hope to be able to spike something at the end of next week.
Benedikt
Am Mo., 18. Feb. 2019 um 20:25 Uhr schrieb Matt Sicker :
> The DSL allows you to break out into parallel stages or sequential
> ones (or both). T
+1
Am Di., 19. Feb. 2019 um 22:35 Uhr schrieb Marcelo Vanzin
:
> I'm opening a vote based on recent discussions about the extra noise
> generated by github updates going to dev@. So please vote:
>
> - +1 to redirect github updates of all commons repos to the issues@ list
> - -1 to keep things as
21 matches
Mail list logo
