Fwd: [IMAGING] PNG component improved

Get Outlook for Android From: Sukant Kumar Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 10:33:46 PM To: Bruno P. Kinoshita Subject: Re: [IMAGING] PNG component improved Hi Kinow, Okay, I understand that you are working on other stuff. Total okay with i

Fwd: [IMAGING] PNG component improved

Get Outlook for Android From: Shukant Pal Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 10:33:45 PM To: Bruno P. Kinoshita Subject: Re: [IMAGING] PNG component improved Hi Kinow, Okay, I understand that you are working on other stuff. Total okay with it

Re: [IMAGING] PNG component improved

Hi Sukant, The project is maintained mainly by volunteers. I am indeed working on other things, including on other issues for [imaging]. Your changes seem interesting, but I would rather work on the other issues first (including the 1.0 release) and postpone reviewing your pull request till tha

[IMAGING] PNG component improved

Hi Fellow Developers, I contributed to Apache Imaging and cleaned up the PNG component. I also added scan-line filtering when writing PNG files, that vastly improves the size of the outputted files. Please look at https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/38. It is open for a long time al

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, 5:25 pm Gilles hi. > Hi Gilles, > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 22:04:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hello Maxim / All > > > > I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the > > error. > > In the clirr code, I found the reason for this error and same is > > documente

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 11:55, Gilles wrote: > > hi. > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 22:04:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hello Maxim / All > > > > I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the > > error. > > In the clirr code, I found the reason for this error and same is > > documented

[GitHub] acoburn opened a new pull request #54: COMMONSRDF-80: Add documentation for OSGi deployment and provisioning

acoburn opened a new pull request #54: COMMONSRDF-80: Add documentation for OSGi deployment and provisioning URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/54 See https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451458901 -

[GitHub] stain edited a comment on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

stain edited a comment on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451458901 Great, would you @acoburn be able to update `implementations.md` on how to use the `jena-osgi-features` as an alternative? I'll

[GitHub] stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451458901 Great, would you be able to update `implementations.md` on how to use the `jena-osgi-features` as an alternative? I'll change to `jena-a

[GitHub] stain commented on a change in pull request #49: Cleanup for FindBugs and PMD warnings in -simple and -jena

stain commented on a change in pull request #49: Cleanup for FindBugs and PMD warnings in -simple and -jena URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/49#discussion_r245311836 ## File path: commons-rdf-simple/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/experimental/AbstractRDF

[GitHub] acoburn commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

acoburn commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451458390 I believe that only `jena-arq` is necessary for `commons-rdf-jena`; as @stain indicates, `apache-jena-libs` may bring in more transit

[GitHub] stain edited a comment on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

stain edited a comment on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451455984 OK, changed to `apache-jena-libs` in ea5c2ff67b16d34deada505aa0f03ee3b84b6aa7, also [documented jena-osgi use](https://github.c

[GitHub] stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451455984 OK, changed to `apache-jena-libs` in ea52c2ff, also [documented jena-osgi use](https://github.com/ajs6f/commons-rdf/blob/COMMONSRDF-80/s

[GitHub] stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451450510 It is not as ideal, as it would make `commons-rdf-jena` as a Maven package no longer be a sufficient OSGi dependency by itself, as `jena

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 6:55 AM Gilles wrote: > hi. > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 22:04:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hello Maxim / All > > > > I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the > > error. > > In the clirr code, I found the reason for this error and same is > > documented

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

hi. On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 22:04:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: Hello Maxim / All I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the error. In the clirr code, I found the reason for this error and same is documented in clirr documentation [1]. A method declaration has been added to t

JDK 12 Early Access build 26 & JDK 13 Early Access builds available

Hi Benedikt, Happy New Year! *OpenJDK builds *- JDK 12 Early Access build 26 is available at http://jdk.java.net/12/ * These early-access, open-source builds are provided under the GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception