I can see the paragraph I wrote way back when, but I'd disagree with myself
now. To be a VALJO you can't be abstract nor have subclasses, even a closed
set. I say this on the basis that AFAICT, future value types will also have
the same restrictions.
That said, VALJO rules are intended as a guide
Hi.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:48:54 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I think this has already been worked out, but the main reason for no
inheritance is that is probably blocks future conversion to value
types.
Composition instead of inheritance is usually the right solution.
Thanks for the rep
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 5:48 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> I think this has already been worked out, but the main reason for no
> inheritance is that is probably blocks future conversion to value types.
> Composition instead of inheritance is usually the right solution.
+1 to that.
>
> St
I think this has already been worked out, but the main reason for no
inheritance is that is probably blocks future conversion to value types.
Composition instead of inheritance is usually the right solution.
Stephen
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 at 10:21, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After the discussion q
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:57 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 19:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
> > -
> > ## Description:
> > - Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
> > Java
> >components.
> >
> > ## Issues:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 19:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
> -
> ## Description:
> - Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
> Java
>components.
>
> ## Issues:
> - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
>
I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
-
## Description:
- Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
Java
components.
## Issues:
- There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
## Activity:
- Activity is good with the release of 6 components.
##
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 13:44, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that we were to wait 24 hours between promotion
> and announcement as to wait for the mirrors of the world to catch up with the
> release promotion on the Apache servers.
Agreed.
The formal release is the source a
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:34:19 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I was under the impression that we were to wait 24 hours between
promotion and announcement as to wait for the mirrors of the world to
catch up with the release promotion on the Apache servers.
The artefacts are already on Maven Central.
I was under the impression that we were to wait 24 hours between promotion and
announcement as to wait for the mirrors of the world to catch up with the
release promotion on the Apache servers.
-Rob
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 8:30 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
>
> We are pleased to announce the availabili
We are pleased to announce the availability of version 1.2 of the
"Apache Commons RNG" library.
Apache Commons RNG provides Java implementations of pseudo-random
numbers generators.
The release notes can be reviewed at
https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/rng/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Distribution pa
Hi.
RC2 was reviewed by the following people:
* Rob Tompkins (+1)
* Alex Herbert (+0.5)
* Gary Gregory (+1)
With my +1, the vote passes with the bare minimum of binding votes.
Regards,
Gilles
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:15:24 +0100, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to release version 1.2 of "Co
12 matches
Mail list logo
