Re: [imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release

2018-09-08 Thread Gary Gregory
I would call it "alpha1" instead of just "alpha". Gary On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 06:58 Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle > as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the > MANIFEST.MF entries

[imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release

2018-09-08 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi all, I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the MANIFEST.MF entries corrected. But now, before I create the dist tag, and upload the zip/tar.gz (this was not executed by the release pl

[all] Prepare release docs outdated for manifest entry "Extension-Name"?

2018-09-08 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hello, While preparing the release candidate for Imaging, I noticed one entry in the instructions that seems to be outdated. Under "Configure the Build to Generate a Complete Set of Release Artifacts" [1], the list of entries for MANIFEST.MF starts with: - Extension-Name: org.apache.commons.f