Sounds good to me. I feel like trying RM'ing some myself once I find time, just
to play with this new release plug-in and compare with what we had to do before
(which would be a great post for blogs.apache.org btw)!
ThanksBruno
From: Rob Tompkins
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Wedn
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 7:13 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob!
>
> Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8!
>
>
> I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to supporting
> Java 9 someday...
>
> I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the mailing
Depends on how complicated your log messages are. Parameterized logging and
automatic level-checking guards aren't available, but it's workable. If you
use Java 8 at least, they added a lambda version of log messages so you
don't even need to worry about string formatting having a performance issue
Am 14.08.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Gary Gregory:
Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apa
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:43:45 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile
>> than [LANG] in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does
>> anyone know what might be going on here?
>
>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:43:45 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile
than [LANG] in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does
anyone know what might be going on here?
No.
[I filled in the new state.]
Best regards,
Gilles
-Rob
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:07:15 +0100, sebb wrote:
No idea, please ask Infra
On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote:
@Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox
to not send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if
it still exists?
-Rob
It's th
On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> Must fix during artifact promotion:
>>> (1) Signature files contain more than the correct signatures (note the
>>> contents below):
>> This is the well known d
Hello infra,
It looks like in JIRA version 7.6.3 we lost the ability to toggle off sending
emails for an update because of a change in the way admin permissions are
granted. Its not entirely clear to me if you can grant this level of
permissions to project admins, but here’s a discussion on the
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> No idea, please ask Infra
Sounds good.
-Rob
>
> On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> @Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not
>> send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if i
No idea, please ask Infra
On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> @Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not
> send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if it still
> exists?
>
> -Rob
> -
@Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not send
email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if it still exists?
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addi
It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile than [LANG]
in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does anyone know what might
be going on here?
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common
Hi Bruno.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:17:55 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
[ X ] +0 OK, but... some issues with RAT in local project site (more
below). Or a +1 if not an issue.
Build passing successfully from git commit on
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-1
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:58:46 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
This vote passes with +1’s from the following (in order of
appearance):
Gilles,
Gary Gregory, and
Rob Tompkins.
Many thanks for all of the patience with me on this RC, as it is the
first multi module component to consume the release-plugi
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:44:44 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
Hi Gilles,
The parts that I think would take a bit more of time would be making
sure it is thread safe
The suggestion does not change anything on this issue wrt
an implementation using "java.util.Observable".
and to write th
OK for me, RERO after all
Cheers
Bruno
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita
Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2018 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8
Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9.
Gary
[ X ] +0 OK, but... some issues with RAT in local project site (more below). Or
a +1 if not an issue.
Build passing successfully from git commit on
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2
Java version: 1.8.0_18
Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9.
Gary
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 05:13 Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
> Hi Rob!
>
> Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8!
>
>
> I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to
> supporting Java 9 someday...
>
> I believe the summary
This vote passes with +1’s from the following (in order of appearance):
Gilles,
Gary Gregory, and
Rob Tompkins.
Many thanks for all of the patience with me on this RC, as it is the first
multi module component to consume the release-plugin. I will perform the
promotions over the next day or so.
Here’s my +1 for this RC.
-Rob
> On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:52 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was
> released, so I would like to release Apache Commons RNG 1.1.
>
> Apache Commons RNG 1.1 RC7 is available for review here:
>h
Hi Gilles,
The parts that I think would take a bit more of time would be making sure it is
thread safe and to write the unit tests, send a pull request, and get some
reviews to make sure it doesn't have any design flaws that would require
deprecating these classes yet again.
Bruno
From
[ X ] +1 Release these artifacts
Building fine on
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2
Java version: 1.8.0_181, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: e
Hi.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:13:48 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
Hi Rob!
Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8!
I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to
supporting Java 9 someday...
I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the
mailing list is th
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>> Must fix during artifact promotion:
>
>> (1) Signature files contain more than the correct signatures (note the
>> contents below):
>
> This is the well known default format of GNU textutil'
Hi Rob!
Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8!
I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to supporting
Java 9 someday...
I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the mailing
list is that looks like Observable/Observable won't be removed from the JDK,
but m
On 13 August 2018 at 20:01, Matt Sicker wrote:
> As an end user of JUL in other projects, let me warn you that you'll miss a
> lot of abstractions that log4j2 and slf4j provide. :)
But do they matter in this context?
Or is JUL (+ adapter) good enough?
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 09:50, Gary Gregor
27 matches
Mail list logo
