Hello Rob.
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 18:22:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Are we a -1 on this RC?
Not necessarily, but no overwhelming numbers of +1 either. :-)
So might be useful to include yet another improvement.
["RNG-50" is currently being worked on by Alex.]
If this is the testing ground for th
Are we a -1 on this RC? The build should work and those are minor changes to
the RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Are we looking for more changes from master?
-Rob
> On Aug 3, 2018, at 5:18 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hi Rob.
>
> If you plan an attempt at RC6 (sorry about that counter not
> settling...), perhaps
Hi Rob.
If you plan an attempt at RC6 (sorry about that counter not
settling...), perhaps it would be worth merging "master" into
branch "1.1"?
If you agree, I'll first fix the "changes.xml" (moving "RNG-50"
to the section of the upcoming release).
Regards,
Gilles
[...]
---
Hi Gary,
Am 03.08.2018 um 18:08 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> The old MD5 files should be gone from our dist release server and replaced
> by SHA files. I did that a month or two ago. So download pages need to be
> adjusted to point to the SHA files only.
thanks for the quick reply.
Ju
Hi Oliver,
The old MD5 files should be gone from our dist release server and replaced
by SHA files. I did that a month or two ago. So download pages need to be
adjusted to point to the SHA files only.
Gary
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:01 AM Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> one question regarding
Hi all,
one question regarding release preparation:
Download pages now link to sha checksums rather than outdated md5
hashes. Thus, the commons-build plugin generates the corresponding links.
There are some components, however, that list multiple versions on their
download pages, e.g. the new 2.
