Re: [rng] commons-rng-jmh module?

> On Jul 11, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:54:56 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Also isn’t removing a module a bc - incompatible change? > > The benchmarking code is/was not part of the functionality. > >>> On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >

Re: [rng] commons-rng-jmh module?

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:54:56 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: Also isn’t removing a module a bc - incompatible change? The benchmarking code is/was not part of the functionality. On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: In my prepping for the release I’ve run across references for “com

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

This VOTE passes with the following +1s from PMC members: - Gary Gregory - Rob Tompkins - Oliver Heger Thank you all for reviewing and voting. I will proceed with the release. Gary On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:04 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant e

Re: [ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

Am 10.07.2018 um 19:13 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Yeah, I dislike *Util names as well, it's not only a co-out but an > encouragement to make such classes dumping-grounds/kitchen-sinks. > > I was thinking [lang] or maybe [collections] but it's not a collection > really. As the implementation is th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Only one minor nit: On the site under Project Reports there is an empty japicmp report. Oliver Am 08.07.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Gary Gregory: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > s

RE: [GitHub] commons-io pull request #62: IO-578: Support java.nio.Path and non-default f...

Hello, I've created the issue IO-768 "Support java.nio.Path and non-default filesystems for ReversedLinesFileReader" and a corresponding pull request apache/commons-io#62 to address a limitation I encou

Re: [collections] 4.2 rat issue (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1)

> On Jul 11, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:26 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins >>

Re: [rng] commons-rng-jmh module?

Also isn’t removing a module a bc - incompatible change? > On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > In my prepping for the release I’ve run across references for > “commons-rng-jmh.” Does this module exist anymore? Is it generated code?? Can > I leave it out? > > -Rob -

[rng] commons-rng-jmh module?

In my prepping for the release I’ve run across references for “commons-rng-jmh.” Does this module exist anymore? Is it generated code?? Can I leave it out? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For ad

Re: [collections] 4.2 rat issue (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:26 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins > wrote: > >> > >>> I’ve got two rat violations: > >>> > >>> > https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

PMCs, May I have at least one more review please? Gary On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:04 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Collections 4.1 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Collections 4.2. >

Re: [all] java release cycle predicament

At present, everything works in Java 11, and thats not released yet. Here is day job project with similar setup running Java 11 on Travis https://travis-ci.org/OpenGamma/Strata/builds/401792237 Ultimately, all builds are dependent on many other teams, but while Java 9 was bad, 10 and 11 have gener