Re: Regarding signatures.

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 6:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Can't we also publish our own? Seems like a valuable contrib… I suppose so. It’s not entirely clear to me what it is (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/signature/java18/1.0/

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:22:39 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:46 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:40 PM Rob Tompkins mailto:chtom...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Gilles

Re: Regarding signatures.

Can't we also publish our own? Seems like a valuable contrib... Gary On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 15:01 Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello mojohaus team, > > I’m from over on Apache Commons, and I was wondering how you find the > java9 analogue of "org.codehaus.mojo.signature:java18:1.0”? I’ve poked > around

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:46 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:40 PM Rob Tompkins > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Gilles > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, 10 Jul

Regarding signatures.

Hello mojohaus team, I’m from over on Apache Commons, and I was wondering how you find the java9 analogue of "org.codehaus.mojo.signature:java18:1.0”? I’ve poked around on the site (http://www.mojohaus.org/animal-sniffer/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

+1 - validated all signatures, - ran “mvn clean test site verify” on maven 3.5.4, with java1.7.0_80, java1.8.0_172, java9.0.4, and java10.0.1 - Nits. We could clean up some of the pmd issues. That weird RAT report. -Rob > On Jul 10, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1. We need

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:40 PM Rob Tompkins > wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Gilles >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:57:24 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: I’ve gotten through most o

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:40 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Gilles > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:57:24 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> I’ve gotten through most of the build except that I get animal > >> sniffer errors depending on what target version I choo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:20 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> I’ve got two rat violations: > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:57:24 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> I’ve gotten through most of the build except that I get animal >> sniffer errors depending on what target version I choose. Below >> maven.compiler.target I’ve added: >> >> 1 >> 8 >> >

[collections] 4.2 rat issue (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1)

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >>> I’ve got two rat violations: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> I’ve got two rat violations: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html >> < >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > I’ve got two rat violations: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html > < > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html > > > but, they look like fi

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:57:24 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: I’ve gotten through most of the build except that I get animal sniffer errors depending on what target version I choose. Below maven.compiler.target I’ve added: 1 8 to try to get the animal sniffer to behave, but it still yields errors. @G

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

I’ve got two rat violations: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html but, they look like files that need to be excluded. Should this invalidate the release?

Re: [rng] animal sniffer java target?

I’ve gotten through most of the build except that I get animal sniffer errors depending on what target version I choose. Below maven.compiler.target I’ve added: 1 8 to try to get the animal sniffer to behave, but it still yields errors. @Gilles - thoughts? -Rob > On Jul 10, 2018, at 3:16 PM,

Re: [RNG] CP 47

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:45:43 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: @Gilles - this is where I see failure’s happening: [INFO] JPMS Integration test .. FAILURE [ 0.413 s] [INFO] JPMS module example (library) .. SKIPPED [INFO] JPMS module example (application) 1

[rng] animal sniffer java target?

I don’t know what we want it to be here. @GIlles - do you have any suggestions? -ROb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

What are the common use cases for this? Do they come from a particular field, and if so, where would you expect to find related code in Commons? Just a thought. If there are likely to be more classes in the same general area, maybe you have found a new component. On 10 July 2018 at 18:13, Gary G

Re: [RNG] CP 47

That’s reasonable. -Rob > On Jul 10, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > How about: > > - create a release branch > - running the tests until you are confident all is well (mvn clean test) > - skipping the tests for the real release by using -DskipTests > - adding suitable notes to the r

Re: [RNG] CP 47

How about: - create a release branch - running the tests until you are confident all is well (mvn clean test) - skipping the tests for the real release by using -DskipTests - adding suitable notes to the read-me and release notes Gary On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:04 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > I’m

Re: [ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

Yeah, I dislike *Util names as well, it's not only a co-out but an encouragement to make such classes dumping-grounds/kitchen-sinks. I was thinking [lang] or maybe [collections] but it's not a collection really. Gary On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:14 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > Wouldn’t this be an ar

Re: [RNG] CP 47

Not sure if this is what you mean but yes, you can have a pseudo-random number generator that, given the same seed, generates a deterministic sequence with a fairly random distribution. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > I’m actually working on this but the non-deterministic

Re: [all] java release cycle predicament

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 12:53 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > Look at Joda-Convert/Joda-Parent for example. A Java 6 project that > builds on Java 8 or later, and has a module-info.java. > > Cobertura just needs replacing with JaCoCo. > > FindBugs replaced by SpotBugs > > Lots of plugin ver

Re: [all] java release cycle predicament

Look at Joda-Convert/Joda-Parent for example. A Java 6 project that builds on Java 8 or later, and has a module-info.java. Cobertura just needs replacing with JaCoCo. FindBugs replaced by SpotBugs Lots of plugin versions updated. And lots of profiles, as per Joda-Convert/Joda-Parent Stephen ht

Re: [RNG] CP 47

@Gilles - this is where I see failure’s happening: [INFO] JPMS Integration test .. FAILURE [ 0.413 s] [INFO] JPMS module example (library) .. SKIPPED [INFO] JPMS module example (application) 1.1-SNAPSHOT . SKIPPED [INFO]

[all] java release cycle predicament

Hello all, It occurs to me that we are in a bit of a predicament in terms of being able to remain current with java, if the projected 6-month release to EOL cycle for major versions of java indeed continues. For example, as of now java9 is EOL, yet we still don’t have sufficient build tools (ma

Re: [ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

Wouldn’t this be an argument for commons-util (specifically for extensions of java.util)? Now, I whole heartedly disagree with naming things “XxxxUtils” because I feel like the whole idea of naming a piece of a machine a utility is a cop out and bad practice in semantics, so maybe this goes with

Re: [RNG] CP 47

I’m actually working on this but the non-deterministic unit tests drive me a little crazy. Is there a way we can both test randomness and have deterministic testing capability? -Rob > On Jul 3, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Gilles wrote: > > Hello Bruno. > > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:07:48 + (UTC), Brun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1. We need more VOTEs please ;-) Going to roll rng, 1.1, and do this today. > > Gary > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:04 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > >> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements >> since Apa

[ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

Does anyone have any thoughts on where an OrderedObservable should live in Commons if at all? import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock; import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock; import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock; import

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

My +1. We need more VOTEs please ;-) Gary On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:04 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Collections 4.1 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Collections 4.2. > > Apache Comm