Re: [ANN] Apache Commons Compress 1.17 Released

2018-06-06 Thread Scott Langley
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-06-05, Scott Langley wrote: > > > Have you decided whether you will now switch development to the 2.0 > branch > > The branch has basically been me tossing ideas around but it has never > gotten any traction inside the dev team. > >

FINAL REMINDER: Apache EU Roadshow 2018 in Berlin next week!

2018-06-06 Thread sharan
Hello Apache Supporters and Enthusiasts This is a final reminder that our Apache EU Roadshow will be held in Berlin next week on 13th and 14th June 2018. We will have 28 different sessions running over 2 days that cover some great topics. So if you are interested in Microservices, Internet of

Re: [Geometry] New Cartesian-centric API

2018-06-06 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 03:48:37 +, Matt Juntunen wrote: Hi all, A couple follow-up notes on this FTR: 1. I don't believe the changes discussed here are actually that much different than any previous version of the library, Perhaps not. What must be clarified is the intent: Cartesian-cent

Re: [release-plugin] TODOs

2018-06-06 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:39:01 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2018 10:57:17 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: [...] I think we KISS it for the next release: let's not worry about multi-module projects. One bite at a time ;-) Maybe I'm

Re: [release-plugin] TODOs

2018-06-06 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jun 5, 2018, at 11:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Gilles > wrote: > >>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 10:57:17 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> I think we KISS it for the next release: let's not worry about >>> multi-module >>> projec

Re: [ANN] Apache Commons Compress 1.17 Released

2018-06-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-06-05, Scott Langley wrote: > Have you decided whether you will now switch development to the 2.0 branch The branch has basically been me tossing ideas around but it has never gotten any traction inside the dev team. > or otherwise begin accepting Java 8 code in order to take advantage o