AW: [lang] Todo utility class

2018-03-17 Thread jhm
That class is not a regular dependency (test/runtime). It is more a tool - especially with the mojo you suggested. So, where we could host tools? Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Matt Benson [mailto:mben...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Freitag, 16. März 2018 22:22 > An: Commons Develo

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

2018-03-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes but consequence was a lack of community increase which is a killer for an incubator project on the long run. Le 17 mars 2018 15:19, "Gilles" a écrit : > On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:47:40 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Le 17 mars 2018 11:49, "Gilles" a écrit : >> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

2018-03-17 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:47:40 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Le 17 mars 2018 11:49, "Gilles" a écrit : On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:39 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2018-03-15 14:36 GMT+01:00 Otto Fowler : If we can come to consensus on the way forward, I’ll be happy to do the work ( alt

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

2018-03-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 17 mars 2018 11:49, "Gilles" a écrit : On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:39 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2018-03-15 14:36 GMT+01:00 Otto Fowler : > > If we can come to consensus on the way forward, I’ll be happy to do the >> work ( although I’ll need help of course ). >> I guess I’m the straw t

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

2018-03-17 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:39 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2018-03-15 14:36 GMT+01:00 Otto Fowler : If we can come to consensus on the way forward, I’ll be happy to do the work ( although I’ll need help of course ). I guess I’m the straw that broke the camel’s back then? ;) On March 15,