Hello,
It seems notifications from the commons-configuration GitHub mirror
are not setup to go to any commons mailing list.
I opened a trivial pull request - #10 [1], but I don't see any emails
on any commons lists for this pull request [2] (well this thread will
show up on the search after it ma
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 7:25 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> On 11 January 2018 at 14:42, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> If you do try to run it locally make sure you add
>> true
>
> It would be useful to be able to define this on the command-line.
Bug found:
https://github.com/apache/commons-release-plugin/blob
Am 13.01.2018 um 15:36 schrieb Gilles:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:48:19 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Given that right now we don’t have sufficient votes to release the
>> plugin, do folks want me to cancel this vote in leu of the lazy vote
>> process cleaning up the nits that folks have found? I’m
On Jan 13, 2018 6:33 AM, "Pascal Schumacher"
wrote:
Am 13.01.2018 um 01:31 schrieb Gilles:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:51:58 +0100, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
>
>> imho we should drop support for java 6 and make every component java 7+
>>
>
> Why?
>
Imho old java versions discourage contributions. J
I will find some time to review this weekend.
Gary
On Jan 13, 2018 6:48 AM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
> Given that right now we don’t have sufficient votes to release the plugin,
> do folks want me to cancel this vote in leu of the lazy vote process
> cleaning up the nits that folks have found? I’m
I agree with this completely, it's also why moving to git is so important.
On 01/13/2018 08:33 AM, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
Am 13.01.2018 um 01:31 schrieb Gilles:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:51:58 +0100, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
imho we should drop support for java 6 and make every component java
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:33:39 +0100, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
Am 13.01.2018 um 01:31 schrieb Gilles:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:51:58 +0100, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
imho we should drop support for java 6 and make every component
java 7+
Why?
Imho old java versions discourage contributions. Java
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:48:19 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Given that right now we don’t have sufficient votes to release the
plugin, do folks want me to cancel this vote in leu of the lazy vote
process cleaning up the nits that folks have found? I’m curious since
folks don’t seem to have the appeti
Given that right now we don’t have sufficient votes to release the plugin, do
folks want me to cancel this vote in leu of the lazy vote process cleaning up
the nits that folks have found? I’m curious since folks don’t seem to have the
appetite for this process.
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 10:51 PM, G
Am 13.01.2018 um 01:31 schrieb Gilles:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:51:58 +0100, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
imho we should drop support for java 6 and make every component java 7+
Why?
Imho old java versions discourage contributions. Java 7 was released in
2011 8 (and Java 8 in 2014), so there is a
Hello.
I propose to migrate codes currently in
org.apache.commons.math4.distribution
to a module "commons-statistics-distribution" in the
new component.
At first, I'll consider only the "one-dimensional"
distributions to avoid a dependency on the
org.apache.commons.math4.linear
package.
"Emp
Hi.
Tools are set up:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-statistics.git
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STATISTICS
Help is wanted to plan the migration (and necessary adaptations)
of codes from "Commons Math".
Current contents of "org.apache.commons.math4.stat" must
I agree. I think it might be valuable to suggest a peek() like method for
iterators but that is a different kettle of fish.
Jena has an ExtendedIterator that provides some extra functionality (like
mapping and filtering as well as converting to lists or sets). In a class
like that might be handy
Is the any implementation requiring to upgrade? IMO always the lower, the
better.
On Jan 12, 2018 18:54, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> When should we update Commons Net from Java 6 to 7?
>
> Gary
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
