Thanks, Stian, that's exactlywas I was expecting.
So I formally CANCEL this VOTE, and I'll prepare a RC3 in the next few
days. includihe fix for COMMONSRDF-69..
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> Good effort, Sergio! Sorry for late review.
> I guess you didn't get to
Oliver, how do you feel about installing Java 9 and trying again?
Gary
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The test calls the registryGetKeys Windows API and that throws an
> exception because Java 9 is not installed on that machine. This is a bug in
> the test only. Fixed in
Stian--
Just a quick technical question (really my own curiosity): I see you built with
`mvn clean install -T1.0C` (explicitly calling out the thread count). Is that
for reproducibility or some other reason?
ajs6f
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
> Good effort, Ser
Frankly, as an observer, this issue seems to be handled pretty poorly.
Commons-Math is currently dead. There are people willing to put in
effort to work on parts of it, but they are blocked at every turn.
Various options are put forward, but nothing ever happens.
In technical terms, if Commons-Mat
Opened INFRA-15611 (syncing to GitHub) & INFRA-15612 (creating a writeable
GitHub repo).
--
Sent from: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Commons-Dev-f680415.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache
Good effort, Sergio! Sorry for late review.
I guess you didn't get to many replies as there was confusion with the
dist/svn revision.. :-(
Sorry, my vote is -1 (binding)
.. as META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE are missing in the binary
JARs in the maven repo.
(Not sure how I missed this befo
Hi Ralph.
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 22:38:06 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
I don’t know
Then please _read_ the ML archive.
why you are ignoring
I do not (willingly) "ignore" any proposal. [Gentle
reminders are welcome if/when I lost track of a pending
issue that is waiting for my input.]
It's rather
