Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

2017-09-30 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers" wrote: Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest only modularizing commons-logging.j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.2 from RC1.

2017-09-30 Thread Gary Gregory
great, thank you! Gary On Sep 30, 2017 10:04, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > > > Am 29.09.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > > > Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC? > > Sorry for the delay. I will take a look tomorrow. Preparing IO 2.6 RC1 > took longer than I thought…

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

2017-09-30 Thread Ralph Goers
Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two. Ralph > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.2 from RC1.

2017-09-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 29.09.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC? Sorry for the delay. I will take a look tomorrow. Preparing IO 2.6 RC1 took longer than I thought… Benedikt > > Thank you in advance for your input, > Gary > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC1

2017-09-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since Apache Commons IO 2.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC1. Commons IO 2.6 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/commons-io-2.6-RC1

Re: [IO] Releasing 2.6

2017-09-30 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sep 30, 2017 02:58, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: Okay, I'll cut RC1 this afternoon. Benedikt Great! Gary Pascal Schumacher schrieb am Sa. 30. Sep. 2017 um 10:47: > Am 30.09.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Am 28.09.2017 um 09:39 schrieb Pascal Schumacher > > : > >> Am 28.09.2017

[GitHub] commons-text issue #66: Adding validation for pair

2017-09-30 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/66 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13508778/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13508778) Coverage increased (+0.0005%) to 98.236% when pulling **0fd044f4b88bfb5055c

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #66: Adding validation for pair

2017-09-30 Thread ameyjadiye
GitHub user ameyjadiye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/66 Adding validation for pair adding validation of pairs where each pair must contain only 2 char min and max. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: [IO] Releasing 2.6

2017-09-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Okay, I'll cut RC1 this afternoon. Benedikt Pascal Schumacher schrieb am Sa. 30. Sep. 2017 um 10:47: > Am 30.09.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Am 28.09.2017 um 09:39 schrieb Pascal Schumacher > > : > >> Am 28.09.2017 um 00:14 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: > >>> The new error is: > >>

Re: [IO] Releasing 2.6

2017-09-30 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 30.09.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Am 28.09.2017 um 09:39 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : Am 28.09.2017 um 00:14 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: The new error is: FileSystemUtilsTestCase.testGetFreeSpace_String:89 expected:<1.02861164E8> but was:<1.0286066E8> I have: 5

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

2017-09-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne : > > The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you > changed anything else in that commit. > > I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer > version of maven may have changed some of the config, and

Re: [IO] Releasing 2.6

2017-09-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 28.09.2017 um 09:39 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : > > Am 28.09.2017 um 00:14 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: >> The new error is: >> FileSystemUtilsTestCase.testGetFreeSpace_String:89 >> expected:<1.02861164E8> but was:<1.0286066E8> >> >> I have: >>5 Dir(s) 104,991,649,792 byt