Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/13157503)
Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 98.259% when pulling
**00011e92477ca610a313c
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> I'm OK with this change.
>
> If it's something important, we can remove and just include a note in the
> release notes saying it is now logged under a different level.
>
I will create a JIRA for it..
I'm OK with this change.
If it's something important, we can remove and just include a note in the
release notes saying it is now logged under a different level.
Cheers
Bruno
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Thursday, 7 September 2017 9:0
There is only ONE message logged at the INFO level, it's still annoying.
IMO.
Gary
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> IMO, due to the low-level nature of Commons VFS, I think it not log at the
> INFO level. Every chatty log events should be at the DEBUG or TRACE l
Hi All,
IMO, due to the low-level nature of Commons VFS, I think it not log at the
INFO level. Every chatty log events should be at the DEBUG or TRACE level.
I'd like to change all INFO messages to DEBUG or TRACE (depending on the
message)
Thoughts?
Gary
GitHub user ameyjadiye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62
TEXT-101: Moved RandomStringUtils to Commons-text
Moved **RandomStringUtils** from lang to text along with changed core logic
which is using **RandomStringGenerator** internally, Test cases
On Sep 6, 2017 13:13, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
>
> Hello Rob,
>
> thank you for preparing another RC.
>
> I still have a 1.5 JDK and ant installed and was able to build the
> source distribution successfully (on Windows 10). I have the impression
On Sep 6, 2017 12:31, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote:
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x).
It has to stay in 3.x no matter what to maintain BC.
Gary
Am 06.09.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Looking
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
> Hello Rob,
>
> thank you for preparing another RC.
>
> I still have a 1.5 JDK and ant installed and was able to build the
> source distribution successfully (on Windows 10). I have the impression
> that the 'test' target does not actually
Ok so sounds a 2.3 from master for next release is ok, or are you bound
somehow to 2.2 ans prefer some backports?
Le 6 sept. 2017 20:07, "Thomas Vandahl" a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> On 05.09.17 20:32, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > @Thomas: can you say a word on the diff between 2.3 and 2.2 if you
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x).
Am 06.09.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
RandomStringGenerator is stro
Hi Romain,
On 05.09.17 20:32, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> @Thomas: can you say a word on the diff between 2.3 and 2.2 if you have it
> still in memory please?
1. The CacheEventQueue has been derived from PooledCacheEventQueue and
most of its methods removed. The previous implementation smelled.
2
Hello Rob,
thank you for preparing another RC.
I still have a 1.5 JDK and ant installed and was able to build the
source distribution successfully (on Windows 10). I have the impression
that the 'test' target does not actually execute tests, but this is
probably not a problem.
I noticed the foll
Great thank you. I just found out we have a bug at work that might only
affect 2.2-SNAPSHOT, so I have to take a look at that first anyway.
Gary
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> Going to Australia in a couple of weeks, so if I volu
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> > > Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but
> > > implies adding a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
> >
> > I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that "Commons
> > Text" would additi
> > Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but
> > implies adding a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
>
> I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that "Commons
> Text" would additionally provide the same easy-to-use API (alias
> "RandomStringUtils"
Hello,
Commons Jelly 1.0.1 RC4 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jelly (svn revision 21487)
The tag is here (tag commit 1807466):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jelly/tags/commons-jelly-1.0.1-RC4
Commit the tag points at:
1807463
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:15:33 +0200, Jan Matèrne wrote:
Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but
implies adding
a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that
"Commons Text" would additionally provide the same e
Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but implies
adding
a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
At the moment the only dependencies are for testing [1].
I am more of a -0 about adding the dependency, because this implies that all
projects using commons-lang have
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 06:55:49 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
>>> for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 06:55:49 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye
wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it
quickly.
Also I
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
> for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
>
> RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it quickly.
> Also I think this tool should belong in Common
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it quickly.
Also I think this tool should belong in Commons text's arsenal. I'm not
only moving RandomStringUtils to text bu
Going to Australia in a couple of weeks, so if I volunteered now I could be
unable to proceed with the release if the first RC failed.
Should no one volunteers, and if you haven't already cut the release, I'd be
glad to try releasing a SVN + multi-module project in mid-October, and at the
same
24 matches
Mail list logo
