Re: [BCEL] Breaking changes in 6.1 needed by Tomcat (?)

Hi again, > Am 31.08.2017 um 01:38 schrieb sebb : > > On 30 August 2017 at 20:11, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> looking through the JavaDoc comments in the Visitor interface, it looks like >> we added additional methods in the 6.0 release. 6.0 was a major rel

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > So volunteers? Gary, Emmanuel, others?? are you up to doing this? > Not for a while for me. Working and moving. Gary > > > On 08/31/2017 06:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Emmanuel Bourg >> wrote: >> >> Le

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

So volunteers? Gary, Emmanuel, others?? are you up to doing this? On 08/31/2017 06:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 31/08/2017 à 23:33, Gilles a écrit : it's a pity we cannot meet in person to sort all those issues Hum, maybe with a few

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 31/08/2017 à 23:33, Gilles a écrit : > > > it's a pity we cannot meet in person to sort all those issues > > Hum, maybe with a few beers you'll be easier to convince ;) > > > > I'm not against you modularizing CM, I'm against me doing it

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Le 31/08/2017 à 23:33, Gilles a écrit : > it's a pity we cannot meet in person to sort all those issues Hum, maybe with a few beers you'll be easier to convince ;) > I'm not against you modularizing CM, I'm against me doing it > just because you "think" it's a better approach to the > (manageme

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:53:56 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 30/08/2017 à 22:14, Gilles a écrit : -1 to asking others to do one's work.[1] So whatever the others think you don't care? If the quantity of work is important to you then you should be happy with a multi-module project since it i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

Checked RC1, and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests looks good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Findbug is failing with Error SF_SWITCH_FALLTHROUGH but no issues since mentioned in comment *break intentionally excluded* 5. Checkstyle looks good. 6. Hashes looks good. 7. Site l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

Le 27/08/2017 à 12:10, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : >   [X] +1 Release it. Emmanuel Bourg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

Hi All: Can we get some extra eyes on this RC please? Thank you! Gary On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > Thank you for taking your time to review this RC! > > Interesting, never paid much attention to what was inclu

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Le 30/08/2017 à 22:14, Gilles a écrit : > -1 to asking others to do one's work.[1] So whatever the others think you don't care? If the quantity of work is important to you then you should be happy with a multi-module project since it induces significantly less work than multiple components: - one

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

Here's my own vote   [ X ] +1 Release it. I believe we have three binding votes (Gary, Oliver, and myself) but given that this is my first time preparing a RC, and that I could be overlooking something as I prepared the RC, I'd appreciate having a few more extra pair of eyes to review this RC,