Re: [ALL] Moving view on builds.a.o

2017-07-27 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst
You can't move it as https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-6961 isn't resolved yet. I noticed there is already another one https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Commons/ so we can delete the top level view. Regards Dennis ---

Re: [ALL] Moving view on builds.a.o

2017-07-27 Thread Gary Gregory
You don't have karma to use what in the UI? I do not see a "move" kind of operation, only "new" ops. Gary On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Happy to do it, but I don't have the correct permissions. > > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Hi All: >

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

2017-07-27 Thread Gary Gregory
git master is now Java 7. Gary On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > We have not in the past forced a major version and Maven coordinate change > when updating the Java platform. We could do that of course. > > Gary > > On Jul 27, 2017 06:47, "Jochen Wiedmann" > wrote: > >> Wo

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

2017-07-27 Thread Amey Jadiye
Hi Rob, If this is still pending I would like to pickup this task. If docker is not much helpful OR we need to wait for it I think we should try what jacoco did. what do you think ? Is it mandatory to use official java images ?Else I am also thinking to create my own ibmjdk8 image on top of give

[GitHub] commons-collections issue #9: COLLECTIONS-551

2017-07-27 Thread chtompki
Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/9 Ok no stress. I'll try to see what I can do with it. Cheers, -Rob. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] commons-collections issue #9: COLLECTIONS-551

2017-07-27 Thread gonmarques
Github user gonmarques commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/9 Hi, It has been almost two and a half years since I opened this PR. I did a quick rebase just to have an idea of any eventual existing conflicts and got a non-trivial conflict

Re: Modern dependencies among commons

2017-07-27 Thread Dave Brosius
I have pushed a first patch to move in this direction with commons-beanutils https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-500 It is breaking in a couple deprecated methods, thus, targetted at a 2.0. given that, there are probably other things we'd want to do. On 07/27/2017 09:48 AM, Joch

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #58: Add tests

2017-07-27 Thread PascalSchumacher
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58#discussion_r129910754 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/text/similarity/CosineSimilarityTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apach

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

2017-07-27 Thread Gary Gregory
We have not in the past forced a major version and Maven coordinate change when updating the Java platform. We could do that of course. Gary On Jul 27, 2017 06:47, "Jochen Wiedmann" wrote: > Wouldn't that make it 5.0? (Binary incompatible change) > > Note: I am not opposing the change, I just p

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

2017-07-27 Thread Matt Benson
I think Jochen is correct wrt the major version bump. But that gets me thinking: what did Java 7 bring that is of any particular relevance for [collections]? Wouldn't it present a much larger opportunity to make the jump to Java 8? Matt On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > W

Re: Modern dependencies among commons

2017-07-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Claude Warren wrote: > >> Perhaps change dependency so that it specifies minimum but leaves maximum >> open. (unless there is an upper limit) > > commons-lang and commons-lang3 are no replacements, they are different > artifacts. Switching fr

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

2017-07-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Wouldn't that make it 5.0? (Binary incompatible change) Note: I am not opposing the change, I just propose an additional change in the version number. Jochen On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I propose we make Java 7 the minimum for Commons Collection 4.2. > >

Re: Modern dependencies among commons

2017-07-27 Thread Jörg Schaible
Claude Warren wrote: > Perhaps change dependency so that it specifies minimum but leaves maximum > open. (unless there is an upper limit) commons-lang and commons-lang3 are no replacements, they are different artifacts. Switching from old to new requires changes in code. - Jörg --

Re: Modern dependencies among commons

2017-07-27 Thread Claude Warren
Perhaps change dependency so that it specifies minimum but leaves maximum open. (unless there is an upper limit) On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Go for it! :-) > > Gary > > On Jul 26, 2017 05:23, "Dave Brosius" wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > I'd like to see all of

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

2017-07-27 Thread Claude Warren
+1 -- time to move forward On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > +1 > > > On 07/25/2017 06:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Hi All: >> >> I propose we make Java 7 the minimum for Commons Collection 4.2. >> >> Gary >> >> > >