On Jun 10, 2017 9:25 PM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita"
wrote:
Hi all,
Looking at https://git.apache.org/, looks like commons-fileupload has been
migrated to Git.
Any objection to removing the @version tags from the code now? I believe
these were used to show the last SVN commit, if my memory serves me w
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/1
Hmmm, this pull request seems to be a bit messed up due to either changes
in the branch, or to the way the commit was created. There are also IDE files
committed. @developerSid if you could u
Hi all,
Looking at https://git.apache.org/, looks like commons-fileupload has been
migrated to Git.
Any objection to removing the @version tags from the code now? I believe these
were used to show the last SVN commit, if my memory serves me well, and are not
supported in Git. So should be OK t
well, i'm still unclear about the action to be taken here, so i'll keep on
beating a dead horse till we fix it or close it at some logic end.
Regards,
Amey
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> Hi Gary, just to conclude the final action and clear midst here, I wish
> you and te
Github user ameyjadiye commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/42
Hi @chtompki, do we expect anything more to be done here ? as per
@garydgregory it looks good to be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
All my remarks have been addressed.
+1
Thank you very much!
Oliver
Am 10.06.2017 um 03:57 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Fileupload 1.3.3 (from RC6).
>
> Tag name:
>commons-fileupload-1.3.3-RC6 (signature can be checked from git using '
Hi.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:38:55 -0500, Tharaka De Silva wrote:
Thank you for the response!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Gilles
wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:00:46 -0500, Tharaka De Silva wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am new to the ASF community
Welcome.
Thank you!
and decid
+1
Building the site with Oracle Java 7 default settings gave me a PermSpace
error so I switched to Java Oracle 8.
>From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
Release notes and notice file OK.
Running 'mvn clean verify site' OK with Oracle Java 8:
Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> +1
>
> Not a blocker: bin zip contains two copies of the Javadoc site, neither of
> which load from their respective index.html; I get the three Javadoc frames
> and an error icon in each frame.
>
Actually both sites are fine. There are just
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> [x] +1 Release it.
>
> Build passing for IBM JDK 8 and Oracle JDK 8. Site generated successfully,
> reports look good too.
>
Oh, good catch on IBM Java 8! That had skipped my mind.
Gary
>
> Chee
10 matches
Mail list logo