On Fri, 12 May 2017 19:26:08 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On May 12, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017 13:31:46 -0400, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Rob Tompkins
wrote:
> On May 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Raymond DeCampo
wrote:
>
> I still think
> On May 12, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 May 2017 13:31:46 -0400, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > On May 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I still think that we should leave geometric
On Fri, 12 May 2017 13:31:46 -0400, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Rob Tompkins
wrote:
> On May 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Raymond DeCampo
wrote:
>
> I still think that we should leave geometric concepts out of
> commons-numbers.
Are we defining numbers using the fu
+1
>From src zip:
- MD5 OK
- SHA1 OK
- ASC OK
Building 'mvn clean install site' OK with:
Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426;
2017-04-03T12:39:06-07:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.5.0\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_131, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Progra
Hi,
Can you please add a BUILDING.txt file to the root of the project?
It would make it easier for reviewers and contributors to test builds with
additional profiles being documented.
Thank you,
Gary
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> > On May 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
> >
> > I still think that we should leave geometric concepts out of
> > commons-numbers.
>
> Are we defining numbers using the fundamental theorem of Algebra? Maybe,
> that’s what sh
> On May 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>
> I still think that we should leave geometric concepts out of
> commons-numbers.
Are we defining numbers using the fundamental theorem of Algebra? Maybe, that’s
what should go in core?
Clearly that would leave out the quaternions, matr
I still think that we should leave geometric concepts out of
commons-numbers.
I also think we are chopping up the modules too fine. Here we have a
module with one class and an intention to maybe introduce another.
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017 22:39:16 +0
On Thu, 11 May 2017 22:39:16 +0200, Gilles wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017 01:43:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote:
Agreed with Raymond +1
If we want to make things modular I would prefer core should have
very core
part of numbers in CN which were in Commons Math and already
separated in
from CM to CN,
On 2017-05-10, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Would the scattering and gathering byte channel APIs in java.nio be helpful
> in splitting up a stream into chunks for parallel processing?
Possibly. pigz breaks up the stream into chunks of 128k and using the
scattering part we should be able to do the same. I
Yup, agreed, and based on that, here's my +1, binding.
Thanks and kudos for the quick investigation!
CheersBruno
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Friday, 12 May 2017 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [compress] ZIP Integration Tests (was Re: [VOTE] Release Compress
1.14 Based
On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> I'll run the tests myself to see what happens here.
>> $ mvn test
>> -Dtest=Zip64SupportIT#writeSmallStoredEntryKnownSizeToFileModeAlways
>> -Prun-zipit
>> ...
>> Failed t
On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I'll run the tests myself to see what happens here.
> $ mvn test
> -Dtest=Zip64SupportIT#writeSmallStoredEntryKnownSizeToFileModeAlways
> -Prun-zipit
> ...
> Failed tests:
>
> Zip64SupportIT.writeSmallStoredEnt
Always happy to help. I started debugging that same test I think, but then
realised I had no idea why that test was failing (nor where to start
investigating why).
Will have another look during the weekend, unless you have fixed it already (-:
CheersBruno
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: Commons
On 2017-05-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'll run the tests myself to see what happens here.
$ mvn test -Dtest=Zip64SupportIT#writeSmallStoredEntryKnownSizeToFileModeAlways
-Prun-zipit
...
Failed tests:
Zip64SupportIT.writeSmallStoredEntryKnownSizeToFileModeAlways:1618->withTemporaryArchive:
On 2017-05-12, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> Build with `mvn clean test` passing OK in my local environment
> Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
> 2015-11-11T05:41:47+13:00)
> Maven home: /opt/maven
> Java version: 1.8.0_131, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: /usr/
Build with `mvn clean test` passing OK in my local environment
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-11T05:41:47+13:00)
Maven home: /opt/maven
Java version: 1.8.0_131, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre
Default locale: en_US, platf
17 matches
Mail list logo
