On Apr 16, 2017 10:56 AM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:
Gilles,
What is your vision on where things should end up? Can you identify what
new commons sub-projects we will have? If it is just 3 or 4 I have no
problem with that. But if we are going to have 10 sub-projects then I
really feel like it should
Gilles,
What is your vision on where things should end up? Can you identify what new
commons sub-projects we will have? If it is just 3 or 4 I have no problem with
that. But if we are going to have 10 sub-projects then I really feel like it
should be done as:
A: Commons Math with Commons Ma
Hi Rob.
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:49:32 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I suppose that I’ll chime in here. Do pardon my delinquency in
responding to the list. I tend to be fairly agnostic on these sorts
of
matters because: (1) I have considerably smaller time in the project
than most of you, and (2) I
Well, as someone with even less time put in than Rob, I'll chime in as well.
First, while I wasn't here for it, it is clear that the fork was traumatic
for the community. It should be expected there would be a recovery time.
I think a lot of positive steps have been taken and given where the
comm
I suppose that I’ll chime in here. Do pardon my delinquency in responding to
the list. I tend to be fairly agnostic on these sorts of matters because: (1) I
have considerably smaller time in the project than most of you, and (2) I have
a serially agnostic temperament [personal issue :-)].
So af
A have committed a proposed resolution for NUMBERS-12 on the branch
feature-NUMBERS-12 in commons-numbers. Feedback or comments from
interested parties are welcome.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-12
https://github.com/apache/commons-numbers/tree/feature-NUMBERS-12
Thanks,
Ray
