+1
Gary
On Apr 14, 2017 6:39 AM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that JEXL 3.1 is out I think it's a good time to move the repository
> to Git. I'd like to start a vote by lazy consensus about the migration,
> the vote will be considered as passed after 72 hours if nobody objects.
>
>
Hi Oliver.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
Am 14.04.2017 um 17:12 schrieb Gilles:
Hi Benedikt.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:49:25 +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
[...]
My personal opinion is, that neither CM, nor numbers or RNG belong
into commons. They are to specific
Hi,
Am 14.04.2017 um 17:12 schrieb Gilles:
> Hi Benedikt.
>
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:49:25 +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry for coming late to the table. I think Gary summed it up pretty
>> well:
>>
>> „I see busy people doing what they want when the want in all
>> of Commons, res
Emmanuel,
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:37:08 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/14/2017 06:12 PM, Gilles wrote:
[I can be clearer: I had this issue with Emmanuel, about the
design and scope of "Commons RNG" (cf. ML archive), and it was
acknowledged that "do-ocracy" must prevail over "opinion".]
We
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/20
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11091808)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 84.215% when pulling
**70594bcaff1d553cb
GitHub user tballison opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/20
COMPRESS-382
first draft of preventing OOM in LZMA
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tballison/commons-compress COMPRESS
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/19
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11090454)
Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 84.15% when pulling
**7e4d9a6a4dfae70e13
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/19
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11090454)
Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 84.15% when pulling
**7e4d9a6a4dfae70e13
On 04/14/2017 06:12 PM, Gilles wrote:
> [I can be clearer: I had this issue with Emmanuel, about the
> design and scope of "Commons RNG" (cf. ML archive), and it was
> acknowledged that "do-ocracy" must prevail over "opinion".]
Well, I had much more than mere "opinions" to offer to RNG, but you
r
GitHub user tballison opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/19
COMPRESS-387
Fix specification of ARCDIR to allow spaces in path in Windows
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tballison/
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/18
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11089922)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 84.233% when pulling
**49f121414b0ba2679
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/18
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11089584)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 84.233% when pulling
**9b0ed3d52d9597a73
>enum wouldn't work for formats added via ServiceLoader. LZO supports a couple
>of names of its own and you couldn't inject them into the enum.
Doh! Got it. New code base...Sorry.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@comm
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:54:24 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Apr 14, 2017, at 8:12 AM, Gilles
wrote:
Regarding the decision to keep CM here at commons: As far as I
remember (I’m sure Gilles has the likes to the archives ;-)) the
PMC
was pretty ambivalent and let it to the CM developers. That g
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:34:22 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-04-13, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:53:27 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
[Reminder: a big part of "Commons RNG" was developed inside CM and
most PMC people did not even know about it (althou
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 8:12 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> Regarding the decision to keep CM here at commons: As far as I
>> remember (I’m sure Gilles has the likes to the archives ;-)) the PMC
>> was pretty ambivalent and let it to the CM developers. That group
>> decided it would be better to stay at c
On 2017-04-14, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
>>> If there is anything COMPRESS can do to detect and avoid the
>>> situation, then please open an issue over here.
> Done: COMPRESS-385, PR submitted
Thanks.
>>> If we wanted to add such a method, what would the return value be?
>>> One of the String
>> If there is anything COMPRESS can do to detect and avoid the situation, then
>> please open an issue over here.
Done: COMPRESS-385, PR submitted
>> If we wanted to add such a method, what would the return value be? One of
>> the String constants contained inside the *Factory classes, likely.
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/18
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11088637)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 84.198% when pulling
**0e5592509b4b8fdbe
GitHub user tballison opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/18
COMPRESS-385
add detect() to CompressorStreamFactory
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tballison/commons-compress COMPRE
Hi Benedikt.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:49:25 +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
sorry for coming late to the table. I think Gary summed it up pretty
well:
„I see busy people doing what they want when the want in all
of Commons, respectfully and diligently.“
After going through the mails, I stil
As always very well put, Stefan!
Stefan Bodewig schrieb am Fr. 14. Apr. 2017 um 16:34:
> On 2017-04-13, Gilles wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:53:27 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >> On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
>
> >>> [Reminder: a big part of "Commons RNG" was developed inside CM and
> >>>
On 2017-04-13, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:53:27 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
>>> [Reminder: a big part of "Commons RNG" was developed inside CM and
>>> most PMC people did not even know about it (although I was opening
>>> JIRA issues all along. Hence
On 2017-04-13, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> On TIKA-1631 [1], users have observed that a corrupt Z file can cause
> an OOM at Internal_.InternalLZWStream.initializeTable.
Ouch.
> Should we try to protect against this at the Tika level, or should we
> open an issue on commons-compress's JIRA?
If
Hi all,
Now that JEXL 3.1 is out I think it's a good time to move the repository
to Git. I'd like to start a vote by lazy consensus about the migration,
the vote will be considered as passed after 72 hours if nobody objects.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of:
Apache Commons JEXL 3.1
Apache Commons JEXL is a library intended to facilitate the
implementation of dynamic and scripting features in applications and
frameworks written in Java.
The release notes can be reviewed at:
http://ww
Hi,
sorry for coming late to the table. I think Gary summed it up pretty well:
„I see busy people doing what they want when the want in all
of Commons, respectfully and diligently.“
After going through the mails, I still don’t understand how the PMC needs to
change it ways in order to move CM f
27 matches
Mail list logo