On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:04:00 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Apr 12, 2017 12:41 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache pr
Hi Oliver.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:41:34 +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather
than
having the PMC support
On Apr 12, 2017 12:41 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than
>>> having the PMC support its o
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than
>>> having the PMC support its own developers in any which way it could?
>>
>> If
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:06:02 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:56:23 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 02:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
Yes; and it is good per se, of course. Unforunately, it didn't
change
the Commons Math i
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than
having the PMC support its own developers in any which way it could?
If nobody is able to maintain commons-math I have no objecti
On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than
> having the PMC support its own developers in any which way it could?
If nobody is able to maintain commons-math I have no objection
recommending an alternative, especially one that is der
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:56:23 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2017 02:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>> Yes; and it is good per se, of course. Unforunately, it didn't change
>>> the Commons Math issue: it's still unmaintained, and from what I o
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:56:23 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 02:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
Yes; and it is good per se, of course. Unforunately, it didn't
change
the Commons Math issue: it's still unmaintained, and from what I
observe
on JIRA, it's not going to improve with time (I said t
Hi Stefan.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:22:23 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[sorry for the comments from the peanut gallery, I haven't been
following MATH and likely will never contribute anything substantial]
On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:03:05 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 02:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Yes; and it is good per se, of course. Unforunately, it didn't change
> the Commons Math issue: it's still unmaintained, and from what I observe
> on JIRA, it's not going to improve with time (I said that much one year
> ago and I was right, in hindsight).
[sorry for the comments from the peanut gallery, I haven't been
following MATH and likely will never contribute anything substantial]
On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:03:05 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> What do you expect now that is blocked by the PMC?
> With "Commons RN
Hi Emmanuel.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:03:05 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Gilles,
I admit I'm not sure to understand what you are complaining about.
Last
year you complained that you were the last one maintaining
commons-math
It was not a complaint, but a (sad) fact.
and that a monolithic co
On 11 April 2017 at 16:36, sebb wrote:
> On 11 April 2017 at 13:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2017-04-11, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> ## Committer base changes:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> - (Missing from LDAP people) was added as a committer on Thu Apr 06
>>> 2017
>>
>> (Missing from LDAP people) ? Ac
Gilles,
I admit I'm not sure to understand what you are complaining about. Last
year you complained that you were the last one maintaining commons-math
and that a monolithic component was unsustainable. Since then we got new
contributors and smaller components have been spun off commons-math.
What
The report has been submitted. Thank you all for your feedback.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 11 April 2017 at 13:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> > On 2017-04-11, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >
>> >> ## Committer base c
16 matches
Mail list logo
