> On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 6 March 2017 at 18:20, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>>
On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
On 5 March 2017 at 04:05, wrote:
Updated RELEASE-NOTES.txt in preparation for 1.0 release
Project: http://git-w
On 6 March 2017 at 18:20, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 March 2017 at 04:05, wrote:
>>> Updated RELEASE-NOTES.txt in preparation for 1.0 release
>>>
>>>
>>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo
>>> Commit: http://git
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 March 2017 at 04:05, wrote:
>> Updated RELEASE-NOTES.txt in preparation for 1.0 release
>>
>>
>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo
>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/commit/bfdd0
On 5 March 2017 at 04:05, wrote:
> Updated RELEASE-NOTES.txt in preparation for 1.0 release
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo
> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/commit/bfdd0aa8
> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-
For Pool, I'm not exactly sure why we need a Java 6 compatible
implementation for the next minor version (2.5). We've had the EOL
discussion before, and even Java 7 is at that point.
The only reason I'd look at updating DBCP to use Java 8 is to support JDBC
4.2 <
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/d
Hello all,
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0 (from RC1).
Tag name:
commons-text-1.0-RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag
-v')
Tag URL:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-text.git;a=commit;h=e38039a3da2244741f5d33ab1b05bdee51c53c3e
Comm
Hello all,
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0 (from RC1).
Tag name:
commons-text-1.0-RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag
-v')
Tag URL:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-text.git;a=commit;h=
e38039a3da2244741f5d33ab1b05bdee51c53c3e
Comm
2017-03-06 10:06 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 05/03/17 18:21, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > I'm also thinking we might want to upgrade to Java 7 for pool 2.5 as dbcp
> > 2.x has required it from the beginning. I'm not exactly sure if anything
> > JDBC changed in Java 8 to warrant an upgrade to Java 8 for
On 05/03/17 18:21, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I'm also thinking we might want to upgrade to Java 7 for pool 2.5 as dbcp
> 2.x has required it from the beginning. I'm not exactly sure if anything
> JDBC changed in Java 8 to warrant an upgrade to Java 8 for dbcp 2.3, but
> it's also worth mentioning if nee