Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32
I suppose I incline to (2) right now. The "magic" URIs are entirely
Jena-specific, so ideally they appear as few places outside of Jena code itself
as possible. On the other hand, `Quad.isDefaultGr
Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32
The Commons RDF marker for the default graph (as of today) is
`Optional.empty()` and not an `RDFNode` (and thus can only be used in the
`Quad.getGraphName()` position).
There are four boun
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:41:17 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4).
>>>
>>> Tag name:
>>> commons-te
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:41:17 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins
wrote:
Hello all,
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from
RC4).
Tag name:
commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git
using 'git tag -v')
$ g
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:03:06 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:28 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Raymond,
Raymond DeCampo wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Gilles
wrote:
A very important issue here: what JDK version do we target?
I'd go for Jav
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4).
>
> Tag name:
> commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git using 'git
> tag -v')
>
> Tag URL:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:15:00 +, sebb wrote:
On 2 February 2017 at 12:35, Emmanuel Bourg
wrote:
Le 1/02/2017 à 20:11, Gilles a écrit :
One aspect is that if we have separate components, they can target
different versions (each time answering the above question).
People in "Commons" pushing
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:41:59 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of
dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages
within a
single module would be better.
Indeed, the proposal was with an eye towards differing depend
On 2 February 2017 at 12:35, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 1/02/2017 à 20:11, Gilles a écrit :
>
>> One aspect is that if we have separate components, they can target
>> different versions (each time answering the above question).
>> People in "Commons" pushing for a supposedly minimal mass for a
>>
Le 1/02/2017 à 20:11, Gilles a écrit :
> One aspect is that if we have separate components, they can target
> different versions (each time answering the above question).
> People in "Commons" pushing for a supposedly minimal mass for a
> component are at odds with offering more choices to contrib
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32
`defaultGraph` is explicit name of the default graph in Jena,
`defaultGraphNode` is for when the system is generating it, not for data.
There are methods for "is this the default graph?" that abstra
Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of
dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages within a
single module would be better.
On 30 Jan 2017 5:53 pm, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote:
> Le 30/01/2017 à 15:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
> > I lean towards going wit
Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:28 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Raymond,
>>
>> Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Gilles
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
A very important issue here: what JDK version do we target?
I'd go for Java8, in the hop
13 matches
Mail list logo
