On 28 January 2017 at 21:08, Claude Warren wrote:
> I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented
> on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract
> tests for the interfaces.
>
> I would like to suggest that RDF commons look at using Junit Co
Hi.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
[...]
Now, for the contents of the "fraction" module.
(1)
My main current concern is the formatting-related classes; as for
"complex", I think that
1. formatting (and I/O) is out of scope, and
2. the implementation were problemat
Agree with Benedikt here, if it's only the .toString() that is important,
then "string" should appear in the method name; otherwise we need to do
Commons Collections style handling of anything that can be empty or not.
To support null (which isn't really "empty" but missing), perhaps just have
the
Like Bene, this feels a little off to me. Just for argument's sake, let's
look at:
Optional.ofNullable(foo).map(Object::toString).filter(StringUtils::isNotBlank).isPresent();
Assuming you're on Java 8, of course. It's a bit long, but not horrible.
What about, in a Java 8-compatible version of [la
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:00:52 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback Gilles.
>>
>
> Thanks for helping with the project!
>
> I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me fine.
>>
>> Re working on an outdated
If you look at the link Matt provided, that handles arrays and collection,
but not Object.toString()
Gary
On Jan 28, 2017 1:13 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Am 28.01.2017 um 02:53 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> The simplest examples I have on hand are instances of Path and URI which
> can be buil
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:00:52 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Gilles.
Thanks for helping with the project!
I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me
fine.
Re working on an outdated branch, I'm not sure I completely
understand what
you want plus
Thanks for the feedback Gilles.
I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me fine.
Re working on an outdated branch, I'm not sure I completely understand what
you want plus I am not a git expert by any stretch. Are you suggesting I
back out the changes on the multimodule bra
Hi Ray.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:44:27 -, raydeca...@apache.org wrote:
Add maven module for fractions package from commons-math
Resolves pull request #4
Whenever possible, we aim at small commits (unless they are all of
the same kind, and it is obvious what is being done repeatedly).
In par
I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented
on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract
tests for the interfaces.
I would like to suggest that RDF commons look at using Junit Contract tests
(https://github.com/Claudenw/junit-contracts) w
> Am 28.01.2017 um 02:53 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> The simplest examples I have on hand are instances of Path and URI which
> can be built with an empty string. I want to know if these are "empty". For
> the app I am now on for example, a Path or null and "" should be treated
> the same. Same fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
