Hello Rob,
Rob Tompkins schrieb am Di., 3. Jan. 2017 um 20:40 Uhr:
> Hello all,
>
> I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
>
> --
>
> [x] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
>
Regards,
Benedikt
> [ ] +0 I am fine with th
On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
+1
Gary
On Jan 3, 2017 11:40 AM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
>
> --
> [ ] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
> [ ] +0 I am fine with this move
> [ ] -0 I am not too keen, be
+1
On 01/03/2017 02:39 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Hello all,
I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
--
[ ] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
[ ] +0 I am fine with this move
[ ] -0 I am not too keen, because ...
[ ] -1 I am
+1
Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
>
> --
> [ ] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
> [ ] +0 I am fine with this move
> [ ] -0 I am not too keen, because ...
> [ ] -1 I am against
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 00:40:43 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
IMHO this concept of promoting components from the sandbox to proper
looks a bit obsolete (any Apache committer has access to our
repositories now)
I don't see any relationship.
AFAIK, the "sandbox" was a place where developers could "pl
Where do pre-release components appear on the website?
On 3 January 2017 at 23:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> IMHO this concept of promoting components from the sandbox to proper
> looks a bit obsolete (any Apache committer has access to our
> repositories now) and it just makes the introduction of
IMHO this concept of promoting components from the sandbox to proper
looks a bit obsolete (any Apache committer has access to our
repositories now) and it just makes the introduction of new components
more complicated.
We could consider that any unreleased component is in a "sandbox" state,
and it
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:39:59 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Hello all,
I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
--
[X] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
Gilles
[ ] +0 I am fine with this move
[ ] -0 I am not too keen, becau
+1
>
> From: Rob Tompkins
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2017 8:39 AM
>Subject: [VOTE] Promote TEXT to Proper
>
>
>Hello all,
>
>I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
>
>-
GitHub user acoburn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/28
set distinct Bundle-SymbolicName values
In the 0.3.0-incubating release, all of the commons-rdf components have the
same `Symbolic-BundleName`, namely: `org.apache.commons.rdf`. This makes it
i
> --[X] +1 Move
> [text] to Commons Proper
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
_
From: Rob Tompkins
Sent: Dienstag, Januar 3, 2017 8:40 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Promote TEXT to Proper
To
Hello,
schrieb am Di., 3. Jan. 2017 um 15:55 Uhr:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Tue Jan 3 14:55:47 2017
> New Revision: 1777131
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1777131&view=rev
> Log:
> Syntax
>
> Modified:
> commons/cms-site/trunk/doap/doap_jcs.rdf
>
> Modified: commons/cms-site/trunk/d
+1
Oliver
Am 03.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> Hello all,
>
> I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
>
> --
> [ ] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
> [ ] +0 I am fine with this move
> [ ] -0 I am not too keen, be
Hello all,
I propose that we move [text] to Commons Proper.
--
[ ] +1 Move [text] to Commons Proper
[ ] +0 I am fine with this move
[ ] -0 I am not too keen, because ...
[ ] -1 I am against this move, because ...
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>>> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process,
I figure that it migh
On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process,
>>> I figure that it might be prudent to ask what the process is for
>>> moving a component ou
Hi Ray,
I have been working on commons-complex but unfortunately have not been
moving as fast as I should. It is actually about ready I have just not
pushed it yet. Let me get the base code up this week, then it will be easy
for you to push changes to it.
Best,
Eric
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:43
I could probably find some time to help out moving the complex number
library out of math and into complex.
I was going to start by generating a pull request for this fix. I found
the apache/commons-complex on github however it is currently empty so I
imagine there is something more fundamental t
Am 03.01.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>
>
>> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
>>> As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process,
>>> I figure that it might be prudent to ask what the process is for
>>>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>> As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process,
>> I figure that it might be prudent to ask what the process is for
>> moving a component out of the sandbox, before I attempt
On 2017-01-03, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process,
> I figure that it might be prudent to ask what the process is for
> moving a component out of the sandbox, before I attempt a release on
> TEXT. So, I was wondering if someone could point me
Hello all,
As a relative novice to the Apache/Apache Commons sandboxing process, I figure
that it might be prudent to ask what the process is for moving a component out
of the sandbox, before I attempt a release on TEXT. So, I was wondering if
someone could point me in the direction of the docu
23 matches
Mail list logo
