Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:01:34 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: Based on all the discussion and that RNG isn’t currently included in the pom, this feels like a great 1.1 forward topic because . [...] because ... ? I’m going to mark the Jira as 1.X as opposed to 1.0. Wrt the issue of providing diffe

Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

Based on all the discussion and that RNG isn’t currently included in the pom, this feels like a great 1.1 forward topic because . I’m going to mark the Jira as 1.X as opposed to 1.0. Regarding getting this in, like I said before I’m indifferent. I think though that this fits into the RERO area

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-jcs #204

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #204

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #203

See Changes: [tv] Performance improvements [tv] Remove unused field and method -- [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-jcs #203

See Changes: [tv] Performance improvements [tv] Remove unused field and method [rmannibucau] JCS-170 replacing at least commas for jmx registration -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading