Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

On 3 December 2016 at 03:24, Charles Honton wrote: > Answering my own question: > According to Apache Release Signing Policy > , "Every artifact distributed > by the Apache Software Foundation must be (signed)”. And the src gz/zip is > the artifa

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

Answering my own question: According to Apache Release Signing Policy , "Every artifact distributed by the Apache Software Foundation must be (signed)”. And the src gz/zip is the artifact we are distributing. I’m investigating to find a way to si

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Charles Honton wrote: > >> Signing is a requirement? >> > > It's what the RM did the last go arounds: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/commons- > parent/commons-parent-40/ > - https://di

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Charles Honton wrote: > Signing is a requirement? > It's what the RM did the last go arounds: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/commons-parent/commons-parent-40/ - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/commons-parent/commons-paren

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

Signing is a requirement? > On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > wrote: > >> I did "mvn clean install -Prelease" from SVN and got in target/: >> >> commons-parent-42-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz >> commons-parent-42-SNAPSHOT-src.zip

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I did "mvn clean install -Prelease" from SVN and got in target/: > > commons-parent-42-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz > commons-parent-42-SNAPSHOT-src.zip > > however they were not installed to the Maven repository, because the > pom says "false"

Re: [CANCE][VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

OK, so the good news is that I do not need to redo a Nexus deployment. I should just need to commit the src zips to the dist dev folder and call a new VOTE with an updated SVN rev for that part of the VOTE... Gary On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wr

Re: svn commit: r1713488 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: changes/changes.xml main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/UrlValidator.java site/xdoc/download_validator.xml test/java/org/

In case anyone is wondering why this commit message is over a year old, please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10748 For some reason the message was treated as spam. On 2 December 2016 at 03:11, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Mon Nov 9 17:48:28 2015 > New Revision: 1713488 > >

Re: [VOTE][RC5] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

Hi Jochen. On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:38:31 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: +1 (Binding) Thank you, but it seems that the missing contents would be against the Apache rules (although there isn't yet an answer to my question about it). I don't know when I can start RC6, but hopefully this issue can b

Re: [VOTE][RC5] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

+1 (Binding) On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi, > > build works fine with Java 7 and Java 8 on Windows 10. When building > with Java 1.6 I got a test failure in the Sampling module (see below), > but it does not seem to be reproducible; probably not blocking. > > The arti

[CANCEL][VOTE][RC5] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

Reason: LICENSE files not included in the JARs. Regards, Gilles P.S. In some way, this is a bug in "commons-parent". Is there a JIRA issue-tracking for it? On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:08:03 +0100, Gilles wrote: Hi. This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC5). [...] -

[RNG] Intermittent failure of unit tests (Was: [VOTE][RC5] ...)

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:59:24 -0800, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:29:17 -0800, Rob Tompkins wrote: Vote: -1 mainly for license, Which files? but there’s the following as well. I just ran “mvn clean test" with java 1.7.0_60 on OS X 10.1

Re: [VOTE][RC5] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:56:49 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: I've had to do the manual deletion for MANY releases. Not fun. And yeah it looks like the POM "fix" to address that breaks other things. Unless there some special profile I do not know about. Is it going to work, or, in the next commons-p