Nice :-)
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM
Subject: commons-io git commit: Revert "remove argLine -Xmx25M option from
surefire plugin, in order to get coveralls to work"
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Repository: commons-io
Updated Branches:
Since you asked, I will bore everyone. :) I already know I'm not
comparing apples to apples and this is extremely high level, but here
are some performance numbers given an identical 3d STL model:
https://github.com/area515/Photonic3D/issues/283
If you want to get my initial opinion, it's goin
Yes we do: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-io/cobertura/index.html
So let's not mess up our tests. WDYT?
Gary
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Wait a sec, what about IO-161? Maybe you need a profile for coveralls
> usage. We have code coverage already right?
>
Wait a sec, what about IO-161? Maybe you need a profile for coveralls
usage. We have code coverage already right?
Gary
On Nov 10, 2016 8:59 AM, wrote:
> Repository: commons-io
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 30e5713a9 -> 676401d29
>
>
> remove argLine -Xmx25M option from surefire plu
