On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:03:44 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly
uncertain, I
would like to atte
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 18:24:16 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 18/09/2016 à 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
I can't help it!
I'll comment...
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:28:19 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Try me. Really.
What is your plan toward modularization?
I've exposed mine, let's see yours.
I can't
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:16:44 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Sep 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 06:37
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Re
Thanks Benedikt, good reminders!
Gary
On Sep 19, 2016 4:26 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently going through the code base to polish it for 3.5. There are
> some things every developer should have a look for so that it is less work
> to prepare a new release:
>
> - always add a
Hi,
I'm currently going through the code base to polish it for 3.5. There are
some things every developer should have a look for so that it is less work
to prepare a new release:
- always add a @since tag when introducing new methods
- make sure the site build still works. I' ve added javadoc:jav
> On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I
>>> would like to attempt working with some s
Hi,
I've reviewed the current code again and I've come to the conclusion that
we should revert it completely. Here is an example of why I think it need
polishing:
public static void smaller(final long value, final long max, final String
message, final Object... values) {
if (value >= max) {
This is what I understood.
Or maybe it was that certain aspects of the CMS don't work on such sites.
It looks as though Commons parent is updateable via CMS but not the components.
On 19 September 2016 at 05:31, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I don’t understand your comment about CMS + svnpubsub. The Loggi
